|
Subject:
|
Concurrent Framework 1 + 2 on Windows Srvr 2003
|
|
Posted By:
|
ruairi
|
Post Date:
|
6/8/2006 4:41:47 AM
|
Hi...
Is it possible to install .NET Framework 2 alongside . NET 1 on a box running Windows Server 2003 (purely for internet traffic)
This is with the aim of running SQL Server Express as a cheap alternative to full SQL Server.
Currently we have about 4000 sessions a day.
I'd appreciate opinions about this scenario. I am currently running with access databases, and have no problems, but I figure SSE would be a step in the right direction, prior to a move to full SQL Server if and when it becomes an issue.
regards,
Ruairi
|
|
Reply By:
|
~Bean~
|
Reply Date:
|
6/8/2006 7:02:19 AM
|
We ranside by side on our old 2K servers, we just got new machines in and put 1.1 and 2.0 on them and no problems.
------------------------- Beware of programmers with screwdrivers...
|
|
Reply By:
|
ruairi
|
Reply Date:
|
6/8/2006 7:44:12 AM
|
Thanks Bean
|
|
Reply By:
|
gabrieldcr2
|
Reply Date:
|
8/2/2006 11:47:42 AM
|
And you can also specify either some apps must run .net framework 1.1 or other ones must run .net framework 2.0 you can set that in the properties of your web app under IIS, or you can set the IIS to run either .net framework 1.1 or 2.0 by default.
|
|
Reply By:
|
thenoseknows
|
Reply Date:
|
8/31/2006 11:25:52 AM
|
It works. We do it. Everyone does it. Go for it!
Just run 1.x and 2.0 sites in different application pools.
Neil Timmerman Programmer Veris Consulting
|