|
Subject:
|
Search module
|
|
Posted By:
|
vantoko
|
Post Date:
|
8/16/2006 8:15:10 AM
|
Hi,
did anyone already try to incorporate a search module for this architecture ?
(or maybe other open source modules ?)
tnx
koen
|
|
Reply By:
|
vantoko
|
Reply Date:
|
9/25/2006 2:54:51 PM
|
still nobody who developed this ?
maybe any other nice features someone likes to share?
|
|
Reply By:
|
jimibt
|
Reply Date:
|
8/6/2007 10:48:11 AM
|
koen - not sure if you're still around. i 'saw' some of your code on another forum re searching but can't for the life of me find it. at present, i still use LIKE comparisons on my search sp's but am migrating over to full-text-indexing.
any chance you could drop off a copy of the stored procs that you used (and any other useful info). I've now started playing with the full-text-indexing malarkie but am unsure on the best way to implement the patterns. just thought i'd seen you add a few regex and NEAR expressions on your implementation, so didn't want to reinvent the wheel (again!!)
[edit] also, how did/do you overcome the 'user instance' caveat when running the application against a user instance of the sqlexpress database??
jimi
http://www.jamestollan.com
|
|
Reply By:
|
vantoko
|
Reply Date:
|
8/7/2007 5:22:37 AM
|
Hi Jimi,
is it this one : http://www.codeplex.com/TheBeerHouse/Thread/View.aspx?ThreadId=1994
koen
|
|
Reply By:
|
jimibt
|
Reply Date:
|
8/7/2007 5:45:01 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by vantoko
Hi Jimi,
is it this one : http://www.codeplex.com/TheBeerHouse/Thread/View.aspx?ThreadId=1994
koen
keon - yep, that was the one. thanks for that. have you had cause to change it in any way since that version??
[edit] i was thinking in particular, use of Row_Number() to allow for paging etc..
jimi
http://www.jamestollan.com
|
|
Reply By:
|
vantoko
|
Reply Date:
|
8/7/2007 7:47:04 AM
|
No, I did not change it since I might use tagging instead of search in the future
|
|
Reply By:
|
jimibt
|
Reply Date:
|
8/7/2007 7:48:43 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by vantoko
No, I did not change it since I might use tagging instead of search in the future
ok, thanks. If I amend the routing in the meantime to accomodate Row_Number(), then i'll post it anyway - in case you're still between search and tAG solutions!!
jimi
http://www.jamestollan.com
|
