|
 |
access thread: RE: (access) RE: Access File Locking
Message #1 by "WISE, MICHAEL" <MMWISE@s...> on Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:03:00 -0500
|
|
Beverly,
I've had similar problems. I use 'svrmgr.exe' (found in the the
WinNT Resource Kit) to display all connected users to the Shared
folder containing the database. This allows me to see which machine
is connected to the share and allows me to disconnect theem. The
'filename.ldb' file will also inform you of who has the database open.
Although I cannot open the .ldb file directly, I have been successful
in copying it and opening the duplicate in Notepad.
Unfortunately, I have not discovered how this situation occurs. The
user tells me that they are no longer connected.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: (access) RE: Access File Locking
Author: "Beverley Usher" <SMTP:bUsher@h...> at SOIGATEWAY
Date: 03/20/2001 3:00 AM
Access 97 files on one of my servers are locking themselves down. All of
the files have been working well in a multi-user environment (and the
same files on three other servers are fine), but on one server, a file
will suddenly insist that it is in use and cannot be used by anyone
else. This is true even early in the morning when no one is at the site.
Even as supervisor/owner of the files, I cannot delete them or change
their name, or delete the directory they are in. The only work-around I
have found so far is to rename the entire directory, create a new one
and put new copies of the files there. The directory I had to recreate
this morning is 700 MB so I really do not want to have to do this much
longer.
Has anyone had a similar problem? Does anyone have any ideas of how to
solve this or of better work-arounds?
Any and all help appreciated.
Beverly
Message #2 by Brian Skelton <brian_skelton@o...> on Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:53:19 GMT
|
|
Jetutils.exe (available here:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/access97/utility1/1/WIN
98/EN-US/JETUTILS.EXE) contains useful stuff for sorting out
problems like these. Along with a white paper that explains
exactly what Access does when it locks a record \ database,
there's an lbd file viewer which tells you who is still
connected to the database and what state the database is in.
BDS
---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:03:00 -0500
>From: "WISE, MICHAEL" <MMWISE@s...>
>Subject: [access] RE: (access) RE: Access File Locking
>To: "Access" <access@p...>
>
> Beverly,
>
> I've had similar problems. I use 'svrmgr.exe' (found
in the the
> WinNT Resource Kit) to display all connected users to
the Shared
> folder containing the database. This allows me to see
which machine
> is connected to the share and allows me to disconnect
theem. The
> 'filename.ldb' file will also inform you of who has the
database open.
> Although I cannot open the .ldb file directly, I have
been successful
> in copying it and opening the duplicate in Notepad.
>
> Unfortunately, I have not discovered how this situation
occurs. The
> user tells me that they are no longer connected.
>
>
>______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
>Subject: (access) RE: Access File Locking
>Author: "Beverley Usher" <SMTP:bUsher@h...>
at SOIGATEWAY
>Date: 03/20/2001 3:00 AM
>
>
>Access 97 files on one of my servers are locking themselves
down. All of
>the files have been working well in a multi-user environment
(and the
>same files on three other servers are fine), but on one
server, a file
>will suddenly insist that it is in use and cannot be used by
anyone
>else. This is true even early in the morning when no one is
at the site.
>Even as supervisor/owner of the files, I cannot delete them
or change
>their name, or delete the directory they are in. The only
work-around I
>have found so far is to rename the entire directory, create
a new one
>and put new copies of the files there. The directory I had
to recreate
>this morning is 700 MB so I really do not want to have to do
this much
>longer.
>
>Has anyone had a similar problem? Does anyone have any ideas
of how to
>solve this or of better work-arounds?
>
>Any and all help appreciated.
>
>Beverly
|
|
 |