|
 |
access thread: Access vs. Larger Databases
Message #1 by chabrown@b... on Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:28:02
|
|
In building a website, is there any formula for determining when to use
Access or when to move up to a larger program such as SQL or Oracle?
Thanks in advance for your help
Charles E. Brown
Message #2 by <gcaprio@r...> on Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:39:52 -0500
|
|
Money. Hardware. Size of the site. Time to market. Database expertise.
There are a lot of things to consider.
-----Original Message-----
From: chabrown@b... [mailto:chabrown@b...]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Access
Subject: [access] Access vs. Larger Databases
In building a website, is there any formula for determining when to use
Access or when to move up to a larger program such as SQL or Oracle?
Thanks in advance for your help
Charles E. Brown
Message #3 by "Kent Rhodes" <kentrhodes@h...> on Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:08:46 -0700
|
|
I've heard it said that Access works well as a database if you've got under
5 users, or under 20mb of data in the table you're using.
I've had many problems with clients who insisted on using Access with 20
users, or more than 60 mb... The problem is that Access won't queue
requests in the same way that SQL Server (the mid-range solution) or better
dbms products can. Instead of queueing, you just lose data, which is quite
frustrating.
If you can, go with at least SQL Server, which at least meets the
entry-level ANSI SQL specifications (Access does not). I feel comfortable
with Access when there are very few users, or the database is very small...
-----Original Message-----
From: chabrown@b... [mailto:chabrown@b...]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Access
Subject: [access] Access vs. Larger Databases
In building a website, is there any formula for determining when to use
Access or when to move up to a larger program such as SQL or Oracle?
Thanks in advance for your help
Charles E. Brown
|
|
 |