Why don=B4t you only do seperate the mailadress with ; and then you 

only do a

split on that. And then you run each mailadress in a function that 

checks

the syntax of the mailadress. And then you do a "For Each loop" and 

sends

the mail to every mailadrees that you have put in.



I Have an exampel on this if you wont it.



Robbin



At 01:41 =EC=EC 3/7/2001 +0200, you wrote:

>I totally agree with you. That's the reason why I'm right now 

developing

>a newsletter subscription system which relies on Windows 2000/Exchange

>2000 and doesn't use Bcc but separate emails for each subscriber.

>

>To bad that this app will not become a freebee <vbg>.

>

><Siegfried/>

>

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: Diane Schips [mailto:info@M...]

>> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 1:20 PM

>> To: ASP CDO

>> Subject: [asp_cdo] RE: Newbie question on CDO 2000

>>

>> Aside from having about 350 email addresses, I would like each 

member

>to

>> receive a professional looking email.  Bcc'ing everyone doesn't look

>> right.

>> It's fine for an email notifying committee members of the next

>meeting,

>> but

>> not for the Temple newsletters.

>>

>> Diane

>

Robbin, I'm afraid I don't follow you.  Can you be more explicit?  And how

would this be better than storing the email addresses in a database?  Where

are you keeping the email addresses between mailings, if not in a database?



Diane



-----Original Message-----

From: Robbin Gille [mailto:robbin.gille@n...]

Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 8:41 AM

To: ASP CDO

Subject: [asp_cdo] SV: RE: Newbie question on CDO 2000



Why donīt you only do seperate the mailadress with ; and then you only do a

split on that. And then you run each mailadress in a function that checks

the syntax of the mailadress. And then you do a "For Each loop" and sends

the mail to every mailadrees that you have put in.



I Have an exampel on this if you wont it.



Robbin