|
 |
asp_databases thread: Which database to use?
Message #1 by "Rick Brose" <brose@u...> on Wed, 25 Apr 2001 17:42:16
|
|
I want to start developing a new site for myself that uses ASP and a
backend database. I figure that the users will need to read heavily from
the database and write fairly often to it. At the start there will not be
many users but I would hope it would grow pretty fast. What type of
database would you recommend using for scalability and that kind of wear?
Any good web resources pertaining to the recommended DB would be great
too. Right now I have really only used Access extensively but know that it
is not very scalable at all. Thanks for the help. You are all truly
amazing.
Message #2 by "Peter Foti (PeterF)" <PeterF@S...> on Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:28:04 -0400
|
|
Hi Rick,
My understanding is that for larger applications, you should use SQL
Server. I have never had any problems using Access though, but I don't
know what the breaking point would be (as far as too many users, etc.).
Pete
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Brose [mailto:brose@u...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 5:42 PM
> To: ASP Databases
> Subject: [asp_databases] Which database to use?
>
>
> I want to start developing a new site for myself that uses ASP and a
> backend database. I figure that the users will need to read
> heavily from
> the database and write fairly often to it. At the start there
> will not be
> many users but I would hope it would grow pretty fast. What type of
> database would you recommend using for scalability and that
> kind of wear?
> Any good web resources pertaining to the recommended DB would
> be great
> too. Right now I have really only used Access extensively but
> know that it
> is not very scalable at all. Thanks for the help. You are all truly
> amazing.
> ---
> SoftArtisans helps developers build robust, scalable Web applications!
> Excel Web reports, charts:
> http://www.softartisans.com/excelwriter.html
> File uploads: http://www.softartisans.com/saf.html
> Transactional file management: http://www.softartisans.com/saf1.html
> Scalability: http://www.softartisans.com/saxsession.html
> ASPstudio value pack: http://www.softartisans.com/aspstudiosuite.html
> PeterF@S...
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
>
>
Message #3 by "Matt Holocher" <mholocher@s...> on Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:00:43 -0400
|
|
Rick-
Here is a good explanation of the 2 different db packages:
Microsoft Access is a good standalone and easy to use database. Features
like autonumbering and cascade update are both supported under Access. You
can push an Access database up to 100 MB in size as long as minimal
concurrent connections are pulling and appending the records; however, once
you exceed 10 or more concurrent database connections, performance will
deteriorate significantly. While Microsoft states that an Access database
will support 30 to 40 concurrent connections, the HostPro shared Web service
environment cannot support this.
Microsoft SQL Server is a much more scalable solution than Microsoft Access.
While the size of the database is a consideration, the primary difference
between Microsoft Access and SQL Server is the number of concurrent sessions
supported by the database. Unlike Access, SQL Server supports up to 30,000
concurrent connections. Additionally, SQL Server does not require periodic
scaling or compacting of your database, a necessary step to preserve data in
Microsoft Access.
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Foti (PeterF) [mailto:PeterF@S...]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 1:28 PM
To: ASP Databases
Subject: [asp_databases] RE: Which database to use?
Hi Rick,
My understanding is that for larger applications, you should use SQL
Server. I have never had any problems using Access though, but I don't
know what the breaking point would be (as far as too many users, etc.).
Pete
Message #4 by "Tomm Matthis" <matthis@b...> on Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:32:03 -0400
|
|
Start with the Microsoft Data Engine... it is a 5-connection version of
SQL Server... when you're ready to deploy the site, you can use SQL
Server and not have to change any code..
Tomm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Brose [mailto:brose@u...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 5:42 PM
> To: ASP Databases
> Subject: [asp_databases] Which database to use?
>
>
> I want to start developing a new site for myself that uses ASP and a
> backend database. I figure that the users will need to read heavily
from
> the database and write fairly often to it. At the start there will not
be
> many users but I would hope it would grow pretty fast. What type of
> database would you recommend using for scalability and that kind of
wear?
> Any good web resources pertaining to the recommended DB would be great
> too. Right now I have really only used Access extensively but
> know that it
> is not very scalable at all. Thanks for the help. You are all truly
> amazing.
Message #5 by "Tomm Matthis" <matthis@b...> on Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:57:35 -0400
|
|
In my experience... Access bogs down around 15 users when used for web
sites....
Tomm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Foti (PeterF) [mailto:PeterF@S...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 1:28 PM
> To: ASP Databases
> Subject: [asp_databases] RE: Which database to use?
>
>
> Hi Rick,
>
> My understanding is that for larger applications, you should use SQL
> Server. I have never had any problems using Access though, but I
don't
> know what the breaking point would be (as far as too many users,
etc.).
> Pete
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rick Brose [mailto:brose@u...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 5:42 PM
> > To: ASP Databases
> > Subject: [asp_databases] Which database to use?
> >
> >
> > I want to start developing a new site for myself that uses ASP and a
> > backend database. I figure that the users will need to read
> > heavily from
> > the database and write fairly often to it. At the start there
> > will not be
> > many users but I would hope it would grow pretty fast. What type of
> > database would you recommend using for scalability and that
> > kind of wear?
> > Any good web resources pertaining to the recommended DB would
> > be great
> > too. Right now I have really only used Access extensively but
> > know that it
> > is not very scalable at all. Thanks for the help. You are all truly
> > amazing.
Message #6 by "Charles Feduke" <webmaster@r...> on Wed, 25 Apr 2001 16:40:20 -0400
|
|
If its for yourself, try MSDE (its free and comes with office... in fact you
might be able to download it or do what my friend did and order it on CD for
free). Its basically a smaller version of SQL Server. Then if you need to
scale up to SQL Server you really don't have to do much work.
- Chuck
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Brose" <brose@u...>
To: "ASP Databases" <asp_databases@p...>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 5:42 PM
Subject: [asp_databases] Which database to use?
> I want to start developing a new site for myself that uses ASP and a
> backend database. I figure that the users will need to read heavily from
> the database and write fairly often to it. At the start there will not be
> many users but I would hope it would grow pretty fast. What type of
> database would you recommend using for scalability and that kind of wear?
> Any good web resources pertaining to the recommended DB would be great
> too. Right now I have really only used Access extensively but know that it
> is not very scalable at all. Thanks for the help. You are all truly
> amazing.
Message #7 by "Tom Parker" <tp482@h...> on Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:10:34
|
|
The advantage of using SQL is you can link in live to your database and
make changes. You can also use DTS to upload tables & objects into your
database.
Using acess if you make changes at your end you have to upload the whole
database replacing the live one which means the sites down for the length
of the upload.
|
|
 |