|
 |
asp_web_howto thread: request.servervariables("HTTP_REFERER") in Netsca- pe 6.x
Message #1 by Shaun Steckley <SSTECKLEY@P...> on Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:38:13 -0500
|
|
Is anyone else having problems reading the "HTTP_REFERER" server variable
when using Netscape 6.x in a SSL environment. The value appears to always
be blank.
Thanks.
Shaun
********************************************************************
The information contained in this email is confidential and
is intended solely for the use of the person identified and
intended as the recipient. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking of
any action in reliance on the contents is prohibited. If you
receive this message in error, contact the sender
immediately and delete it from your computer.
Personal e-mails are restricted by PSECU policy. As such,
PSECU specifically disclaims any responsibility or liability
for any personal information or opinions of the author
expressed in this email.
********************************************************************
Message #2 by "phil griffiths" <pgtips@m...> on Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:10:58
|
|
I haven't personally run into to this problem but I have seen others
complain of it. This was posted on slashdot - perhaps the feature appears
in NS6 too?
==========================================================
On the subject of cookies there's a feature in Mozilla (Netscape) 5.0 that
allows you to enter 'Anonymous Mode' and it does this by giving you an
empty cookies file (so sites that insist on using cookies still can) and
not sending any HTTP_REFERRER information so they don't know what site
referred you. Disabling anonymous mode returms your normal cookies file,
discards the anonymous cookies file and starts sending HTTP_REFERRER
information again.
==========================================================
HTH
Phil
> Is anyone else having problems reading the "HTTP_REFERER" server variable
> when using Netscape 6.x in a SSL environment. The value appears to
always
> be blank.
>
> Thanks.
> Shaun
|
|
 |