Wrox Home  
Search P2P Archive for: Go

  Return to Index  

aspx thread: RE: aspx digest: November 17, 2000


Message #1 by "Brian Gerby" <brian.gerby@e...> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:05:17 -0500
Netscape 6 is just awful.



Message #2 by danielw@w... on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 00:23:01 -0000
> Netscape 6 is just awful.



Is it realy? Have you downloaded it yet, or shall I get in touch with

Netscape, and let their lawyers sue us over that assertion?



<Please do not feed the troll./>

Daniel Walker

Wrox Press

Message #3 by =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicolai_S=F8rensen?= <nss@j...> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 11:27:01 +0100
Hehe, I installed it, tried it, deleted it and reinstalled my system. Not

only is it awful, it even has problems with basic HTML.

In my opinion this is the worst release of netscape so far.



Regards

Nicolai Sørensen

Jubii A/S  - Programmer

http://www.jubii.dk



-----Original Message-----

From: danielw@w... [mailto:danielw@w...]

Sent: 18. november 2000 01:23

To: ASP+

Subject: [aspx] RE: aspx digest: November 17, 2000





> Netscape 6 is just awful.



Is it realy? Have you downloaded it yet, or shall I get in touch with

Netscape, and let their lawyers sue us over that assertion?



<Please do not feed the troll./>

Daniel Walker

Wrox Press



Message #4 by Chris Ullman <chrisu@w...> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:38:23 -0000

>>Not only is it awful, it even has problems with basic HTML.

>>In my opinion this is the worst release of netscape so far.



Sounds like a bad install, I'd try it again, the HTML 4/CSS 1/2 and DOM 1/2

stuff is pretty hot, what it lacks is the overall stability of IE5.5 and it

takes an age to start up. I'd bin NN 4.x at last and say goodbye to layers

and all that non-standard rubbish....anyway if you want to discuss this

further, the html_code_clinic list we run would be an ideal place (I'm sure

Dan would agree).



Moving further debate to there...

Chris


  Return to Index