|
 |
aspx thread: RE: aspx digest: November 17, 2000
Message #1 by "Brian Gerby" <brian.gerby@e...> on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:05:17 -0500
|
|
Netscape 6 is just awful.
Message #2 by danielw@w... on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 00:23:01 -0000
|
|
> Netscape 6 is just awful.
Is it realy? Have you downloaded it yet, or shall I get in touch with
Netscape, and let their lawyers sue us over that assertion?
<Please do not feed the troll./>
Daniel Walker
Wrox Press
Message #3 by =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicolai_S=F8rensen?= <nss@j...> on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 11:27:01 +0100
|
|
Hehe, I installed it, tried it, deleted it and reinstalled my system. Not
only is it awful, it even has problems with basic HTML.
In my opinion this is the worst release of netscape so far.
Regards
Nicolai Sørensen
Jubii A/S - Programmer
http://www.jubii.dk
-----Original Message-----
From: danielw@w... [mailto:danielw@w...]
Sent: 18. november 2000 01:23
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] RE: aspx digest: November 17, 2000
> Netscape 6 is just awful.
Is it realy? Have you downloaded it yet, or shall I get in touch with
Netscape, and let their lawyers sue us over that assertion?
<Please do not feed the troll./>
Daniel Walker
Wrox Press
Message #4 by Chris Ullman <chrisu@w...> on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:38:23 -0000
|
|
>>Not only is it awful, it even has problems with basic HTML.
>>In my opinion this is the worst release of netscape so far.
Sounds like a bad install, I'd try it again, the HTML 4/CSS 1/2 and DOM 1/2
stuff is pretty hot, what it lacks is the overall stability of IE5.5 and it
takes an age to start up. I'd bin NN 4.x at last and say goodbye to layers
and all that non-standard rubbish....anyway if you want to discuss this
further, the html_code_clinic list we run would be an ideal place (I'm sure
Dan would agree).
Moving further debate to there...
Chris
|
|
 |