Wrox Home  
Search P2P Archive for: Go

  Return to Index  

aspx thread: VB.Net versus C#


Message #1 by margia@m... on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 05:41:04 -0000
What is the advantage, if any, is there in using C# over VB in the net

framework?  Is it faster than VB?  Or is it simply a matter of using what

is closest to the language a programmer's already knows? C++ or VB.

Message #2 by "Kukreja, Puneet" <kukrejap@a...> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:59:19 +1100
It is matter of Programming choice.. if you like using curly braces then C#

is for you but if you prefer using Dims then VB.Net is the way to go the

other thing is that ASP+ has been written in C#  so I assume it has a

greater lower level bonding with it or else there is no persay major

advantage.. am pretty new myself.. so hope this helps.



Regards,

Puneet Kukreja

ANZ Banking Group.

Max - Intranet Centre 

19/570 Burke Street

Melbourne, VICTORIA, 3000

www.anz.com

Phone  :+xx x xxxxxxxx

Mobile :   0403037010

Fax     :+xx x xxxxxxxx

Mailto:kukrejap@a...









Message #3 by John Pirkey <mailjohnny101@y...> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 07:42:34 -0800 (PST)
ASP+, C# and VB.Net are all compiled into the CLR at run time, so the playing field

is perfectly even.  Now, it really is a pure matter of choice preference.  As far as

i know and from what i've heard, C# has no advantage over VB for writing ASP+

applications - simply because, in the end, the exact same code is running.



john







=====



---------------------------- 

John Pirkey 

MCSD 

John@S... 

CIO - Shallow Water Systems 

WebMaster - www.ShallowWaterSystems.com, www.stlvbug.org



Message #4 by "Anders Lundholm" <lundholm@s...> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 21:01:50 +0100
Perhaps the C# compiler is providing better MSIL code, so that the CLR will

have a better job at optimizing it for the VOS. I don't know .. doesn't C#

offer some better programming methods than VB.NEt?! Are they 100% equal?



with regards

anders lundholm · lundholm@s...

the sphereworx / monoliner experience

--





Message #5 by "Thomas Tomiczek" <t.tomiczek@t...> on Sat, 13 Jan 2001 10:02:02 +0100
No, they are not - VB is still only a subset, though it is VERY near.

Basically, you are missing some variable types.



Thomas Tomiczek

THONA Consulting

http://www.thona-consulting.com/



-----Original Message-----

From: Anders Lundholm [mailto:lundholm@s...]

Sent: Freitag, 12. Januar 2001 21:02

To: ASP+

Subject: [aspx] RE: VB.Net versus C#





Perhaps the C# compiler is providing better MSIL code, so that the CLR

will

have a better job at optimizing it for the VOS. I don't know .. doesn't

C#

offer some better programming methods than VB.NEt?! Are they 100% equal?



with regards

anders lundholm =B7 lundholm@s...

the sphereworx / monoliner experience

--



Message #6 by Scott Guthrie <scottgu@m...> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:26:41 -0800
John is correct.  The language you use with ASP.NET and .NET in general is

purely a "lifestyle choice" -- meaning you should use whatever language you

personally feel most comfortable with.  You will not see performance

differences between VB.NET and C# with the final product.



Thanks,



Scott



-----Original Message-----

From: John Pirkey [mailto:mailjohnny101@y...]

Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 7:43 AM

To: ASP+

Subject: [aspx] RE: VB.Net versus C#





ASP+, C# and VB.Net are all compiled into the CLR at run time, so the

playing field

is perfectly even.  Now, it really is a pure matter of choice preference.

As far as

i know and from what i've heard, C# has no advantage over VB for writing

ASP+

applications - simply because, in the end, the exact same code is running.



john







=====



---------------------------- 

John Pirkey 

MCSD 

John@S... 

CIO - Shallow Water Systems 

WebMaster - www.ShallowWaterSystems.com, www.stlvbug.org





---

http://www.asptoday.com - the leading site for timely,

in-depth information for ASP developers everywhere.




Message #7 by "Scott Davis" <Scott.D@e...> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:35:48 -0500
From what I was told at a recent .NET class, the difference with VB.NET 

is

the use of different default options.  The VB team chose to make things 

a

little easier for their audience (VB programmers) in certain situations. 

 The

C# team didn't feel the need to make things easier for their programming

audience and used some defaults that were a little less straight 

forward, but

provided better performance.  The same options are still available in 

both

languages, but the defaults are different.  Unfortunately, I don't have

anything to back this up with, as I did not write down any of the 

examples

that were given.  Just thought I'd share what I was told by someone on 

the

CLR team at this class.  Take it for what it's worth.



Scott Davis

MCSD, MCP

International Parts

Decision Consultants Inc.





-----Original Message-----

From: Scott Guthrie [mailto:scottgu@m...]

Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 10:27 PM

To: ASP+

Subject: [aspx] RE: VB.Net versus C#





John is correct.  The language you use with ASP.NET and .NET in general 

is

purely a "lifestyle choice" -- meaning you should use whatever language 

you

personally feel most comfortable with.  You will not see performance

differences between VB.NET and C# with the final product.



Thanks,



Scott



-----Original Message-----

From: John Pirkey [mailto:mailjohnny101@y...]

Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 7:43 AM

To: ASP+

Subject: [aspx] RE: VB.Net versus C#





ASP+, C# and VB.Net are all compiled into the CLR at run time, so the

playing field

is perfectly even.  Now, it really is a pure matter of choice 

preference.

As far as

i know and from what i've heard, C# has no advantage over VB for writing

ASP+

applications - simply because, in the end, the exact same code is 

running.



john







=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D



----------------------------

John Pirkey

MCSD

John@S...

CIO - Shallow Water Systems

WebMaster - www.ShallowWaterSystems.com, www.stlvbug.org






  Return to Index