|
 |
aspx thread: VB.Net versus C#
Message #1 by margia@m... on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 05:41:04 -0000
|
|
What is the advantage, if any, is there in using C# over VB in the net
framework? Is it faster than VB? Or is it simply a matter of using what
is closest to the language a programmer's already knows? C++ or VB.
Message #2 by "Kukreja, Puneet" <kukrejap@a...> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:59:19 +1100
|
|
It is matter of Programming choice.. if you like using curly braces then C#
is for you but if you prefer using Dims then VB.Net is the way to go the
other thing is that ASP+ has been written in C# so I assume it has a
greater lower level bonding with it or else there is no persay major
advantage.. am pretty new myself.. so hope this helps.
Regards,
Puneet Kukreja
ANZ Banking Group.
Max - Intranet Centre
19/570 Burke Street
Melbourne, VICTORIA, 3000
www.anz.com
Phone :+xx x xxxxxxxx
Mobile : 0403037010
Fax :+xx x xxxxxxxx
Mailto:kukrejap@a...
Message #3 by John Pirkey <mailjohnny101@y...> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 07:42:34 -0800 (PST)
|
|
ASP+, C# and VB.Net are all compiled into the CLR at run time, so the playing field
is perfectly even. Now, it really is a pure matter of choice preference. As far as
i know and from what i've heard, C# has no advantage over VB for writing ASP+
applications - simply because, in the end, the exact same code is running.
john
=====
----------------------------
John Pirkey
MCSD
John@S...
CIO - Shallow Water Systems
WebMaster - www.ShallowWaterSystems.com, www.stlvbug.org
Message #4 by "Anders Lundholm" <lundholm@s...> on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 21:01:50 +0100
|
|
Perhaps the C# compiler is providing better MSIL code, so that the CLR will
have a better job at optimizing it for the VOS. I don't know .. doesn't C#
offer some better programming methods than VB.NEt?! Are they 100% equal?
with regards
anders lundholm · lundholm@s...
the sphereworx / monoliner experience
--
Message #5 by "Thomas Tomiczek" <t.tomiczek@t...> on Sat, 13 Jan 2001 10:02:02 +0100
|
|
No, they are not - VB is still only a subset, though it is VERY near.
Basically, you are missing some variable types.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting
http://www.thona-consulting.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Anders Lundholm [mailto:lundholm@s...]
Sent: Freitag, 12. Januar 2001 21:02
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] RE: VB.Net versus C#
Perhaps the C# compiler is providing better MSIL code, so that the CLR
will
have a better job at optimizing it for the VOS. I don't know .. doesn't
C#
offer some better programming methods than VB.NEt?! Are they 100% equal?
with regards
anders lundholm =B7 lundholm@s...
the sphereworx / monoliner experience
--
Message #6 by Scott Guthrie <scottgu@m...> on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:26:41 -0800
|
|
John is correct. The language you use with ASP.NET and .NET in general is
purely a "lifestyle choice" -- meaning you should use whatever language you
personally feel most comfortable with. You will not see performance
differences between VB.NET and C# with the final product.
Thanks,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: John Pirkey [mailto:mailjohnny101@y...]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 7:43 AM
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] RE: VB.Net versus C#
ASP+, C# and VB.Net are all compiled into the CLR at run time, so the
playing field
is perfectly even. Now, it really is a pure matter of choice preference.
As far as
i know and from what i've heard, C# has no advantage over VB for writing
ASP+
applications - simply because, in the end, the exact same code is running.
john
=====
----------------------------
John Pirkey
MCSD
John@S...
CIO - Shallow Water Systems
WebMaster - www.ShallowWaterSystems.com, www.stlvbug.org
---
http://www.asptoday.com - the leading site for timely,
in-depth information for ASP developers everywhere.
Message #7 by "Scott Davis" <Scott.D@e...> on Mon, 15 Jan 2001 08:35:48 -0500
|
|
From what I was told at a recent .NET class, the difference with VB.NET
is
the use of different default options. The VB team chose to make things
a
little easier for their audience (VB programmers) in certain situations.
The
C# team didn't feel the need to make things easier for their programming
audience and used some defaults that were a little less straight
forward, but
provided better performance. The same options are still available in
both
languages, but the defaults are different. Unfortunately, I don't have
anything to back this up with, as I did not write down any of the
examples
that were given. Just thought I'd share what I was told by someone on
the
CLR team at this class. Take it for what it's worth.
Scott Davis
MCSD, MCP
International Parts
Decision Consultants Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Guthrie [mailto:scottgu@m...]
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 10:27 PM
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] RE: VB.Net versus C#
John is correct. The language you use with ASP.NET and .NET in general
is
purely a "lifestyle choice" -- meaning you should use whatever language
you
personally feel most comfortable with. You will not see performance
differences between VB.NET and C# with the final product.
Thanks,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: John Pirkey [mailto:mailjohnny101@y...]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 7:43 AM
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] RE: VB.Net versus C#
ASP+, C# and VB.Net are all compiled into the CLR at run time, so the
playing field
is perfectly even. Now, it really is a pure matter of choice
preference.
As far as
i know and from what i've heard, C# has no advantage over VB for writing
ASP+
applications - simply because, in the end, the exact same code is
running.
john
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
----------------------------
John Pirkey
MCSD
John@S...
CIO - Shallow Water Systems
WebMaster - www.ShallowWaterSystems.com, www.stlvbug.org
|
|
 |