|
 |
aspx thread: Beta2
Message #1 by "GfWeis" <gfw@y...> on Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:50:43 -0500
|
|
I'm now up and running with Beta2 - on Friday I did the conversion of my
work machine and the Guestbook. On Saturday I converted my WebPoll and my
web site at http://yyyz.net - this morning I converted my server.
I followed the same proceedure...
Uninstall VS.Net Web Controls
Uninstall VS.Net
Uninstall .Net SDK
Remove all directories
Clean up the Registry
Install Vs.Net
The server runs great and hopefully both machines will continue without the
reformat that everyone else seems to think is required. The difference in
speed between Beta1 and Beta2 has definately improved.
The Beta2 version of both the Guestbook and the Webpoll can be viewed at
http://72t.net - all the calculators at 72t.Net use COM engines and even
those calls appear to be faster. No changes to any of the code except for
the Sql, Templates and File object.
Thanks again for all your help!
Gfw
Message #2 by "Albert Davis" <albertdavis@h...> on Mon, 02 Jul 2001 10:24:11 -0400
|
|
I don't understand what you mean by "Clean up the registry"... There are
hundreds and hundreds of .NET entries... How did you do it by hand? This
must of taken you 20 hours or so...
-- Al
>From: "GfWeis" <gfw@y...>
>Reply-To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
>To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
>Subject: [aspx] Beta2
>Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:50:43 -0500
>
>I'm now up and running with Beta2 - on Friday I did the conversion of my
>work machine and the Guestbook. On Saturday I converted my WebPoll and my
>web site at http://yyyz.net - this morning I converted my server.
>
>I followed the same proceedure...
>Uninstall VS.Net Web Controls
>Uninstall VS.Net
>Uninstall .Net SDK
>Remove all directories
>Clean up the Registry
>Install Vs.Net
>
>The server runs great and hopefully both machines will continue without the
>reformat that everyone else seems to think is required. The difference in
>speed between Beta1 and Beta2 has definately improved.
>
>The Beta2 version of both the Guestbook and the Webpoll can be viewed at
>http://72t.net - all the calculators at 72t.Net use COM engines and even
>those calls appear to be faster. No changes to any of the code except for
>the Sql, Templates and File object.
>
>Thanks again for all your help!
>
>Gfw
>
>
>
Message #3 by "Gfw" <yyyz@h...> on Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:56:33 -0500
|
|
Actually it took about 30 minutes to clean the registry. I used regedit and
started by searching for the 'Visual' entries and deleted the ones
associated with Visual Studio .Net - the I used Norton's Cleansweep to
identify a few more for VS and a few for .Net and deleted those. I didn't
count, but as you suggest there are lots. The time involved was
substantially less than rebuilding the entire machine. While I don't know if
it will always work, it seems to have worked these two times. One machine
runs Win2000 Pro, the other Win2000 Server.
Gfw
-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Davis [mailto:albertdavis@h...]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 9:24 AM
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
I don't understand what you mean by "Clean up the registry"... There are
hundreds and hundreds of .NET entries... How did you do it by hand? This
must of taken you 20 hours or so...
-- Al
>From: "GfWeis" <gfw@y...>
>Reply-To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
>To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
>Subject: [aspx] Beta2
>Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:50:43 -0500
>
>I'm now up and running with Beta2 - on Friday I did the conversion of my
>work machine and the Guestbook. On Saturday I converted my WebPoll and my
>web site at http://yyyz.net - this morning I converted my server.
>
>I followed the same proceedure...
>Uninstall VS.Net Web Controls
>Uninstall VS.Net
>Uninstall .Net SDK
>Remove all directories
>Clean up the Registry
>Install Vs.Net
>
>The server runs great and hopefully both machines will continue without the
>reformat that everyone else seems to think is required. The difference in
>speed between Beta1 and Beta2 has definately improved.
>
>The Beta2 version of both the Guestbook and the Webpoll can be viewed at
>http://72t.net - all the calculators at 72t.Net use COM engines and even
>those calls appear to be faster. No changes to any of the code except for
>the Sql, Templates and File object.
>
>Thanks again for all your help!
>
>Gfw
>
>
Message #4 by "Albert Davis" <albertdavis@h...> on Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:06:46 -0400
|
|
Outstanding! I hope everything works out for you... I just spotted too
many entries as I started on my search for anything that has to do with .NET
&& || Visual. I deleted as many as I could (I thought I deleted them all)
spending quite amount of time as well and still got an error stating that
the Beta1 has to be fully uninstalled before installing Beta2.... So I just
go fed up, re-imaged my machine, and was done with it...
-- Al
>From: "Gfw" <yyyz@h...>
>Reply-To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
>To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
>Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
>Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:56:33 -0500
>
>Actually it took about 30 minutes to clean the registry. I used regedit and
>started by searching for the 'Visual' entries and deleted the ones
>associated with Visual Studio .Net - the I used Norton's Cleansweep to
>identify a few more for VS and a few for .Net and deleted those. I didn't
>count, but as you suggest there are lots. The time involved was
>substantially less than rebuilding the entire machine. While I don't know
>if
>it will always work, it seems to have worked these two times. One machine
>runs Win2000 Pro, the other Win2000 Server.
>
>Gfw
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Albert Davis [mailto:albertdavis@h...]
>Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 9:24 AM
>To: ASP+
>Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
>
>
>I don't understand what you mean by "Clean up the registry"... There are
>hundreds and hundreds of .NET entries... How did you do it by hand? This
>must of taken you 20 hours or so...
>
>-- Al
>
>
> >From: "GfWeis" <gfw@y...>
> >Reply-To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
> >To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
> >Subject: [aspx] Beta2
> >Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:50:43 -0500
> >
> >I'm now up and running with Beta2 - on Friday I did the conversion of my
> >work machine and the Guestbook. On Saturday I converted my WebPoll and my
> >web site at http://yyyz.net - this morning I converted my server.
> >
> >I followed the same proceedure...
> >Uninstall VS.Net Web Controls
> >Uninstall VS.Net
> >Uninstall .Net SDK
> >Remove all directories
> >Clean up the Registry
> >Install Vs.Net
> >
> >The server runs great and hopefully both machines will continue without
>the
> >reformat that everyone else seems to think is required. The difference in
> >speed between Beta1 and Beta2 has definately improved.
> >
> >The Beta2 version of both the Guestbook and the Webpoll can be viewed at
> >http://72t.net - all the calculators at 72t.Net use COM engines and even
> >those calls appear to be faster. No changes to any of the code except for
> >the Sql, Templates and File object.
> >
> >Thanks again for all your help!
> >
> >Gfw
> >
> >
Message #5 by "Yogesh" <yogeshjohar@h...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:16:06
|
|
Problem .....
Hi,
Now my problem ;) I just installed .NET Framework Beta 2 on NT 4.0 machine
with IIS 4, IE 5.5, SP 6a. But when I execute my .aspx files server
controls just don't appear. Is something I am missing in terms on settings
or configuration. This is just formatted machine...
Pleas reply.
Regards & Thanks
Message #6 by "Juan T. Llibre" <j.llibre@c...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 08:20:22 -0400
|
|
ASP.NET is NOT supported on NT 4.0 for Beta 2.
You need W2K or Win XP for ASP.NET.
...and please do NOT send the same message
with two different subjects.
We can read it just fine the first ( and only ) time you send it.
OK ?
Juan T. Llibre
Microsoft MVP [IIS/ASP]
===================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yogesh" <yogeshjohar@h...>
To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 12:16 PM
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
> Problem .....
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Now my problem ;) I just installed .NET Framework Beta 2 on NT 4.0 machine
> with IIS 4, IE 5.5, SP 6a. But when I execute my .aspx files server
> controls just don't appear. Is something I am missing in terms on settings
> or configuration. This is just formatted machine...
>
> Pleas reply.
>
> Regards & Thanks
>
> ---
> * Fast, Full-Featured Microsoft® Excel Web Reports & Charts!
> A breakthrough in high performance Web application development,
SoftArtisans
> ExcelWriter 1.1 supports native Excel charting, image insertion, and
> advanced functions & formatting. One click generates presentation-quality
> Excel spreadsheets-and ExcelWriter performs over 100 times faster than the
> Excel Object. Several editions, including ExcelWriterFREE, are available.
> http://www.softartisans.com/softartisans/excelwriter.html>
>
Message #7 by "Thomas Tomiczek" <t.tomiczek@t...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:15:35 +0200
|
|
Hm,
IMHO ASP.NET support was DROPPED for Windows NT.
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
-----Original Message-----
From: Yogesh [mailto:yogeshjohar@h...]
Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2001 14:16
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
Problem .....
Hi,
Now my problem ;) I just installed .NET Framework Beta 2 on NT 4.0
machine
with IIS 4, IE 5.5, SP 6a. But when I execute my .aspx files server
controls just don't appear. Is something I am missing in terms on
settings
or configuration. This is just formatted machine...
Pleas reply.
Regards & Thanks
Message #8 by "Albert Davis" <albertdavis@h...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 08:43:45 -0400
|
|
Yogesh,
Supporting ASP.NET is mainly due to IIS... ASP.NET Beta2 is only supported
by IIS Version 5.0, which comes as an add-on for the newer Windows operating
systems. At a glance you will be able to get full functionality from
ASP.NET with Windows 2000 Professional (+IIS 5.0), Windows XP, Windows 2000
Server / Advanced Server / and Datacenter Server. Without IIS 5.0 you will
not have any luck running ASP.NET.
The reason most of the reply's are stating that ASP.NET Beta2 has been
dropped or discontinued from NT is because IIS 4.0 was the latest version
for that OS.
-- Al
>From: "Thomas Tomiczek" Reply-To: "ASP+" To: "ASP+" Subject: [aspx] Re:
>Beta2 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:15:35 +0200
>
>Hm,
>
>IMHO ASP.NET support was DROPPED for Windows NT.
>
>Regards
>
>Thomas Tomiczek THONA Consulting Ltd.
>
>-----Original Message----- From: Yogesh [mailto:yogeshjohar@h...]
>Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2001 14:16 To: ASP+ Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
>
>Problem .....
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Now my problem ;) I just installed .NET Framework Beta 2 on NT 4.0 machine
>with IIS 4, IE 5.5, SP 6a. But when I execute my .aspx files server
>controls just don't appear. Is something I am missing in terms on settings
>or configuration. This is just formatted machine...
>
>Pleas reply.
>
>Regards & Thanks
>
>
Message #9 by Wim Hollebrandse <Wim.Hollebrandse@c...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:39:25 +0100
|
|
Who rattled your cage?
-----Original Message-----
From: Juan T. Llibre [mailto:j.llibre@c...]
Sent: 11 July 2001 13:20
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
ASP.NET is NOT supported on NT 4.0 for Beta 2.
You need W2K or Win XP for ASP.NET.
...and please do NOT send the same message
with two different subjects.
We can read it just fine the first ( and only ) time you send it.
OK ?
Juan T. Llibre
Microsoft MVP [IIS/ASP]
Message #10 by "Juan T. Llibre" <j.llibre@c...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 09:04:55 -0400
|
|
Nobody "rattled my cage"....because there's no cage to rattle.
It's not courteous to send multiple identical messages to
the same list server, which differ only in the subject heading.
It's a waste of time, effort and bandwidth to do so.
Why did my calling Yogesh's attention to that bother you ?
I did say "please"...and I answered his question.
Do you need/want to read duplicate messages ?
Or did that rattle *your* cage ?
Juan T. Llibre
Microsoft MVP [IIS/ASP]
"Beginning ASP.NET", Wrox Press - Look for it in August!
==========================================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wim Hollebrandse" <Wim.Hollebrandse@c...>
To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:39 AM
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
Who rattled your cage?
-----Original Message-----
From: Juan T. Llibre [mailto:j.llibre@c...]
Sent: 11 July 2001 13:20
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
ASP.NET is NOT supported on NT 4.0 for Beta 2.
You need W2K or Win XP for ASP.NET.
...and please do NOT send the same message
with two different subjects.
We can read it just fine the first ( and only ) time you send it.
OK ?
Juan T. Llibre
Microsoft MVP [IIS/ASP]
Message #11 by Wim Hollebrandse <Wim.Hollebrandse@c...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:52:27 +0100
|
|
How stable is the beta2 in comparison with beta1? And is the
performance
better?
Is there such a thing as an uninstall with beta2?
Wim
-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Davis [mailto:albertdavis@h...]
Sent: 11 July 2001 13:44
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
Yogesh,
Supporting ASP.NET is mainly due to IIS... ASP.NET Beta2 is only
supported
by IIS Version 5.0, which comes as an add-on for the newer Windows
operating
systems. At a glance you will be able to get full functionality from
ASP.NET with Windows 2000 Professional (+IIS 5.0), Windows XP, Windows
2000
Server / Advanced Server / and Datacenter Server. Without IIS 5.0 you
will
not have any luck running ASP.NET.
The reason most of the reply's are stating that ASP.NET Beta2 has been
dropped or discontinued from NT is because IIS 4.0 was the latest
version
for that OS.
-- Al
Message #12 by "Thomas Tomiczek" <t.tomiczek@t...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:12:58 +0200
|
|
Would say it was this funny guy named "common sense".
Thomas Tomiczek
-----Original Message-----
From: Wim Hollebrandse [mailto:Wim.Hollebrandse@c...]
Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2001 14:39
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
Who rattled your cage?
-----Original Message-----
From: Juan T. Llibre [mailto:j.llibre@c...]
Sent: 11 July 2001 13:20
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
ASP.NET is NOT supported on NT 4.0 for Beta 2.
You need W2K or Win XP for ASP.NET.
...and please do NOT send the same message
with two different subjects.
We can read it just fine the first ( and only ) time you send it.
OK ?
Juan T. Llibre
Microsoft MVP [IIS/ASP]
Message #13 by Wim Hollebrandse <Wim.Hollebrandse@c...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:30:48 +0100
|
|
Can't have been you then. ;-p
(A bit less about common sense and more about .NET please. - moderator)
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Tomiczek [mailto:t.tomiczek@t...]
Sent: 11 July 2001 14:13
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
Would say it was this funny guy named "common sense".
Thomas Tomiczek
-----Original Message-----
From: Wim Hollebrandse [mailto:Wim.Hollebrandse@c...]
Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2001 14:39
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
Who rattled your cage?
-----Original Message-----
From: Juan T. Llibre [mailto:j.llibre@c...]
Sent: 11 July 2001 13:20
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
ASP.NET is NOT supported on NT 4.0 for Beta 2.
You need W2K or Win XP for ASP.NET.
...and please do NOT send the same message
with two different subjects.
We can read it just fine the first ( and only ) time you send it.
OK ?
Juan T. Llibre
Microsoft MVP [IIS/ASP]
Message #14 by Wim Hollebrandse <Wim.Hollebrandse@c...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:37:42 +0100
|
|
On a more serious note - getting back to ASP.NET stuff:
Does anyone know whether MDAC 2.7 is really necessary in order to run
ASP.NET Prem. Edition? Are all other existing non-NET applications
still
usable when installing version 2.7 of MDAC?
Cheers,
Wim
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Tomiczek [mailto:t.tomiczek@t...]
Sent: 11 July 2001 14:13
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
Would say it was this funny guy named "common sense".
Thomas Tomiczek
-----Original Message-----
From: Wim Hollebrandse [mailto:Wim.Hollebrandse@c...]
Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2001 14:39
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
Who rattled your cage?
-----Original Message-----
From: Juan T. Llibre [mailto:j.llibre@c...]
Sent: 11 July 2001 13:20
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
ASP.NET is NOT supported on NT 4.0 for Beta 2.
You need W2K or Win XP for ASP.NET.
...and please do NOT send the same message
with two different subjects.
We can read it just fine the first ( and only ) time you send it.
OK ?
Juan T. Llibre
Microsoft MVP [IIS/ASP]
Message #15 by "Brian Bilbro" <bbilbro@h...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:35:12 -0400
|
|
I know that www.aspalliance.com has beta 2 and mdac 2.7 and does not appear
to be having any problem with any "legacy" asp/ado code.
--
Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wim Hollebrandse" <Wim.Hollebrandse@c...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:37 AM
On a more serious note - getting back to ASP.NET stuff:
Does anyone know whether MDAC 2.7 is really necessary in order to run
ASP.NET Prem. Edition? Are all other existing non-NET applications still
usable when installing version 2.7 of MDAC?
Cheers,
Wim
Message #16 by "steve schofield " <steve@a...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:19:50 -0500
|
|
I've been running beta 2 and mdac 2.7 on aspfree.com server with no issues.
we have 12 other traditional asp sites also on the server using both regu
lar connection using ado and also using com objects that connect to a sql 7
db's and access with no issues.
steve schofield
steve@a...
webmaster
http://aspfree.com
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Brian Bilbro" <bbilbro@h...>
Reply-To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:35:12 -0400
>I know that www.aspalliance.com has beta 2 and mdac 2.7 and does not appea
r
>to be having any problem with any "legacy" asp/ado code.
>
>--
>Brian
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Wim Hollebrandse" <Wim.Hollebrandse@c...>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:37 AM
>
>
>On a more serious note - getting back to ASP.NET stuff:
>
>Does anyone know whether MDAC 2.7 is really necessary in order to run
>ASP.NET Prem. Edition? Are all other existing non-NET applications still
>usable when installing version 2.7 of MDAC?
>
>Cheers,
>Wim
Message #17 by "Thomas Tomiczek" <t.tomiczek@t...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 19:14:54 +0200
|
|
Dd me to this.
We make some tests on a three souble processor webfarm for nearly one
week now, and things run flawless.
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd
-----Original Message-----
From: steve schofield [mailto:steve@a...]
Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2001 17:20
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
I've been running beta 2 and mdac 2.7 on aspfree.com server with no
issues. we have 12 other traditional asp sites also on the server using
both regular connection using ado and also using com objects that
connect to a sql 7 db's and access with no issues.
steve schofield
steve@a...
webmaster
http://aspfree.com
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Brian Bilbro" <bbilbro@h...>
Reply-To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:35:12 -0400
>I know that www.aspalliance.com has beta 2 and mdac 2.7 and does not
appear
>to be having any problem with any "legacy" asp/ado code.
>
>--
>Brian
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Wim Hollebrandse" <Wim.Hollebrandse@c...>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:37 AM
>
>
>On a more serious note - getting back to ASP.NET stuff:
>
>Does anyone know whether MDAC 2.7 is really necessary in order to run
>ASP.NET Prem. Edition? Are all other existing non-NET applications
still
>usable when installing version 2.7 of MDAC?
>
>Cheers,
>Wim
Message #18 by Wim Hollebrandse <Wim.Hollebrandse@c...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 17:59:31 +0100
|
|
Thanks for that Brian and Steve. I have installed it now as well. MDAC
2.7 +
ASP.NET Premium Edition beta2.
-----Original Message-----
From: steve schofield [mailto:steve@a...]
Sent: 11 July 2001 16:20
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
I've been running beta 2 and mdac 2.7 on aspfree.com server with no
issues.
we have 12 other traditional asp sites also on the server using both
regular
connection using ado and also using com objects that connect to a sql 7
db's
and access with no issues.
steve schofield
steve@a...
webmaster
http://aspfree.com
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Brian Bilbro" <bbilbro@h...>
Reply-To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:35:12 -0400
>I know that www.aspalliance.com has beta 2 and mdac 2.7 and does not
appear
>to be having any problem with any "legacy" asp/ado code.
>
>--
>Brian
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Wim Hollebrandse" <Wim.Hollebrandse@c...>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:37 AM
>
>
>On a more serious note - getting back to ASP.NET stuff:
>
>Does anyone know whether MDAC 2.7 is really necessary in order to run
>ASP.NET Prem. Edition? Are all other existing non-NET applications
still
>usable when installing version 2.7 of MDAC?
>
>Cheers,
>Wim
Message #19 by "Chris Sano" <t-csano@m...> on Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:08:21 -0700
|
|
Since we are on the topic of beta2, I figured I'd throw in what I know:
The .NET framework (except for ASP.NET) is supported on the following:
Windows 98
Windows 98 SE
Windows ME
Windows NT
Windows 2000 professional/server and XP professional/server support the
ENTIRE framework. The home edition of WindowsXP doesn't quite support
everything (i.e. System.Web).
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Bilbro [mailto:bbilbro@h...]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 7:35 AM
To: ASP+
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
I know that www.aspalliance.com has beta 2 and mdac 2.7 and does not
appear
to be having any problem with any "legacy" asp/ado code.
--
Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wim Hollebrandse" <Wim.Hollebrandse@c...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:37 AM
On a more serious note - getting back to ASP.NET stuff:
Does anyone know whether MDAC 2.7 is really necessary in order to run
ASP.NET Prem. Edition? Are all other existing non-NET applications still
usable when installing version 2.7 of MDAC?
Cheers,
Wim
Message #20 by "Yogesh" <yogeshjohar@h...> on Thu, 12 Jul 2001 03:22:47
|
|
Hi Juan and all,
Thanks for reply, But this small thing is not specified anywhere in the
download page of .NET framework beta 2 that asp.net work, if u install
this on NT 4.
I accept my mistake, actually this was by mistake I entered same question.
Thanks Wim too. ;)
Regards,
Yogesh
> ASP.NET is NOT supported on NT 4.0 for Beta 2.
> You need W2K or Win XP for ASP.NET.
>
> ...and please do NOT send the same message
> with two different subjects.
>
> We can read it just fine the first ( and only ) time you send it.
>
> OK ?
>
>
> Juan T. Llibre
> Microsoft MVP [IIS/ASP]
> ===================
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yogesh" <yogeshjohar@h...>
> To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 12:16 PM
> Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
Message #21 by "Juan T. Llibre" <j.llibre@c...> on Thu, 12 Jul 2001 04:59:06 -0400
|
|
Yogesh,
ASP.NET and transactions from managed code
are no longer supported in Windows NT 4.0.
These features are now available only
on Windows 2000 and Windows XP.
The following namespaces do NOT work under NT 4.0 :
System.Web :
System.Web.Caching
System.Web.Configuration
System.Web.Security
System.Web.UI
System.Web.UI.Design
System.Web.UI.Design.WebControls
System.Web.UI.Design.Util
System.Web.UI.HTMLControls
System.Web.UI.WebControls
System.Web.Util
System.Web.Handlers
System.Web.Hosting
System.Web.SessionState
System.Web.Mail
System.EnterpriseServices
System.Messaging :
Message.Transaction.Id
Message.Transaction.IsLastInTransaction
Message.Transaction.IsFirstInTransaction
Everything else will work under NT 4.0.
I wouldn't waste my time developing for NT 4.0.
Support for NT 4.0 may be reinstated once the product releases,
but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that to happen.
Get yourself W2K, [ Server or Pro ]
...or Windows XP [ Home or Windows.NET ] ( still in beta... )
best,
Juan T. Llibre
Microsoft MVP [IIS/ASP]
"Beginning ASP.NET", Wrox Press - Look for it in August!
========================================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yogesh" <yogeshjohar@h...>
To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 3:22 AM
Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
> Hi Juan and all,
>
> Thanks for reply, But this small thing is not specified anywhere in the
> download page of .NET framework beta 2 that asp.net work, if u install
> this on NT 4.
>
> I accept my mistake, actually this was by mistake I entered same question.
>
> Thanks Wim too. ;)
>
> Regards,
> Yogesh
>
>
>
>
> > ASP.NET is NOT supported on NT 4.0 for Beta 2.
> > You need W2K or Win XP for ASP.NET.
> >
> > ...and please do NOT send the same message
> > with two different subjects.
> >
> > We can read it just fine the first ( and only ) time you send it.
> >
> > OK ?
> >
> >
> > Juan T. Llibre
> > Microsoft MVP [IIS/ASP]
> > ===================
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Yogesh" <yogeshjohar@h...>
> > To: "ASP+" <aspx@p...>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 12:16 PM
> > Subject: [aspx] Re: Beta2
>
> ---
> * Fast, Full-Featured Microsoft® Excel Web Reports & Charts!
> A breakthrough in high performance Web application development,
SoftArtisans
> ExcelWriter 1.1 supports native Excel charting, image insertion, and
> advanced functions & formatting. One click generates presentation-quality
> Excel spreadsheets-and ExcelWriter performs over 100 times faster than the
> Excel Object. Several editions, including ExcelWriterFREE, are available.
> http://www.softartisans.com/softartisans/excelwriter.html>
>
|
|
|
View Cart
