Wrox Home  
Search P2P Archive for: Go

  Return to Index  

aspx thread: C# or VB.Net


Message #1 by mendoza@r... on Fri, 14 Mar 2003 17:09:02
I am an asp developer using vb script primarily and now transitioning into 
asp.net.  For you guys that went through this same transition, should I 
pursue C# or should I go VB.Net?

any comments/inputs would be appreciated.

thx,
emmy
Message #2 by "Alex Smotritsky" <alex.smotritsky@v...> on Fri, 14 Mar 2003 12:01:47 -0500
I don't know how things are gonna turn out market wise, but from a
technical standpoint, C# is better.


-----Original Message-----
From: mendoza@r... [mailto:mendoza@r...] 
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:09 PM
To: ASP.NET
Subject: [aspx] C# or VB.Net


I am an asp developer using vb script primarily and now transitioning
into 
asp.net.  For you guys that went through this same transition, should I 
pursue C# or should I go VB.Net?

any comments/inputs would be appreciated.

thx,
emmy

Message #3 by "Rahul Singh" <rahul.singh@a...> on Fri, 14 Mar 2003 13:44:22 -0800
It doesn't matter.

C# is for raw power.
VB.NET is for productivity. 

In .NET they are equivalent. 
In VS2003, VB.NET goes back to its roots (RAD) 

Your choice.

Rahul Singh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alex Smotritsky" <alex.smotritsky@v...>
To: "ASP.NET" <aspx@p...>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 9:01 AM
Subject: [aspx] RE: C# or VB.Net


> I don't know how things are gonna turn out market wise, but from a
> technical standpoint, C# is better.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mendoza@r... [mailto:mendoza@r...] 
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:09 PM
> To: ASP.NET
> Subject: [aspx] C# or VB.Net
> 
> 
> I am an asp developer using vb script primarily and now transitioning
> into 
> asp.net.  For you guys that went through this same transition, should I 
> pursue C# or should I go VB.Net?
> 
> any comments/inputs would be appreciated.
> 
> thx,
> emmy
> 
> 
> 
Message #4 by "Samuel Engelman" <samuel_engelman@p...> on Fri, 14 Mar 2003 14:13:37 -0500
Rahul,


What do you mean by "In VS2003, VB.NET goes back to its roots (RAD)"




|---------+--------------------------------------->
|         |   "Rahul Singh"                       |
|         |   <rahul.singh@a...>      |
|         |                                       |
|         |                                       |
|         |   Friday March 14, 2003 04:44 PM      |
|         |   Please respond to "ASP.NET"         |
|         |                                       |
|---------+--------------------------------------->
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                                   |
  |       To:                                         "ASP.NET" <aspx@p...>                   |
  |       cc:                                                                                         |
  |       Subject:   [aspx] RE: C# or VB.Net                                                          |
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




It doesn't matter.

C# is for raw power.
VB.NET is for productivity.

In .NET they are equivalent.
In VS2003, VB.NET goes back to its roots (RAD)

Your choice.

Rahul Singh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Smotritsky" <alex.smotritsky@v...>
To: "ASP.NET" <aspx@p...>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 9:01 AM
Subject: [aspx] RE: C# or VB.Net


> I don't know how things are gonna turn out market wise, but from a
> technical standpoint, C# is better.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mendoza@r... [mailto:mendoza@r...]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:09 PM
> To: ASP.NET
> Subject: [aspx] C# or VB.Net
>
>
> I am an asp developer using vb script primarily and now transitioning
> into
> asp.net.  For you guys that went through this same transition, should I
> pursue C# or should I go VB.Net?
>
> any comments/inputs would be appreciated.
>
> thx,
> emmy
>
>
>





Message #5 by "Dave Buckner" <Dave@n...> on Fri, 14 Mar 2003 15:41:14 -0600
I use both. Vb.Net for UI only.

Regards,
Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Smotritsky [mailto:alex.smotritsky@v...]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 11:02 AM
To: ASP.NET
Subject: [aspx] RE: C# or VB.Net


I don't know how things are gonna turn out market wise, but from a 
technical
standpoint, C# is better.


-----Original Message-----
From: mendoza@r... [mailto:mendoza@r...]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:09 PM
To: ASP.NET
Subject: [aspx] C# or VB.Net


I am an asp developer using vb script primarily and now transitioning 
into
asp.net.  For you guys that went through this same transition, should I
pursue C# or should I go VB.Net?

any comments/inputs would be appreciated.

thx,
emmy





Message #6 by "Palani, Sakthivel (Cognizant)" <PSakthiv@c...> on Sat, 15 Mar 2003 13:10:47 +0530
Rahul,
I heard that the IL code generated by C# compiler is better optimized. In other words C# is faster than VB.Net, however i don't have
benchmarks to prove that.

Regards,
Sakthi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rahul Singh [mailto:rahul.singh@a...]
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 3:14 AM
To: ASP.NET
Subject: [aspx] RE: C# or VB.Net


It doesn't matter.

C# is for raw power.
VB.NET is for productivity. 

In .NET they are equivalent. 
In VS2003, VB.NET goes back to its roots (RAD) 

Your choice.

Rahul Singh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alex Smotritsky" <alex.smotritsky@v...>
To: "ASP.NET" <aspx@p...>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 9:01 AM
Subject: [aspx] RE: C# or VB.Net


> I don't know how things are gonna turn out market wise, but from a
> technical standpoint, C# is better.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mendoza@r... [mailto:mendoza@r...] 
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:09 PM
> To: ASP.NET
> Subject: [aspx] C# or VB.Net
> 
> 
> I am an asp developer using vb script primarily and now transitioning
> into 
> asp.net.  For you guys that went through this same transition, should I 
> pursue C# or should I go VB.Net?
> 
> any comments/inputs would be appreciated.
> 
> thx,
> emmy
> 
> 
> 


Message #7 by "Alex Smotritsky" <alex.smotritsky@v...> on Sat, 15 Mar 2003 21:16:41 -0500
I read that all .net compliant languages should tend toward the same
speed because they all compile into IL, it's just a matter of the
compiler people getting the compiler good enough. I think C# is a little
faster then VB.NET currently.


-----Original Message-----
From: Palani, Sakthivel (Cognizant) [mailto:PSakthiv@c...] 
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 2:41 AM
To: ASP.NET
Subject: [aspx] RE: C# or VB.Net


Rahul,
I heard that the IL code generated by C# compiler is better optimized.
In other words C# is faster than VB.Net, however i don't have benchmarks
to prove that.

Regards,
Sakthi.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rahul Singh [mailto:rahul.singh@a...]
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 3:14 AM
To: ASP.NET
Subject: [aspx] RE: C# or VB.Net


It doesn't matter.

C# is for raw power.
VB.NET is for productivity. 

In .NET they are equivalent. 
In VS2003, VB.NET goes back to its roots (RAD) 

Your choice.

Rahul Singh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alex Smotritsky" <alex.smotritsky@v...>
To: "ASP.NET" <aspx@p...>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 9:01 AM
Subject: [aspx] RE: C# or VB.Net


> I don't know how things are gonna turn out market wise, but from a 
> technical standpoint, C# is better.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mendoza@r... [mailto:mendoza@r...]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:09 PM
> To: ASP.NET
> Subject: [aspx] C# or VB.Net
> 
> 
> I am an asp developer using vb script primarily and now transitioning 
> into asp.net.  For you guys that went through this same transition, 
> should I pursue C# or should I go VB.Net?
> 
> any comments/inputs would be appreciated.
> 
> thx,
> emmy
> 
> 
> 





  Return to Index