|
 |
aspx_beginners thread: Test vs. Production Development
Message #1 by jude@j... on Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:47:34
|
|
Here's another one for which I haven't been able to dig up an answer...
With ASP, I use Macromedia's UltraDev. It allows me to write code locally,
send a *temp* file to the production server to see how the page looks and
if it functions, and then "synchronize" (copy) the development page over
the production page if I want to commit the changes to the production box.
I think I am missing something with the VS .Net IDE. It creates a project
directory and files on the production box. I find myself doing my
development work on the live (production) web pages, as I have no local,
synchronized copy. This is not very desireable, as coding errors can bring
down a web site. Nor would it be too cool to have to change connection
strings and file locations if I develop locally and then try to transfer
everything to a production box.
Am I missing something obvious? Is there a way to set up a local project
that mirrors the files on the production box in such a way that
development won't affect the live production pages until I'm ready to
commit my changes BUT at the same time not require any connection or URL
changes?
Thanks, from the blind!
j
Message #2 by "Dogers" <dogers@t...> on Wed, 6 Mar 2002 21:31:03 -0000
|
|
> send a *temp* file to the production server to see how the
> synchronized copy. This is not very desireable, as coding
> errors can bring
> down a web site. Nor would it be too cool to have to change
Surely these two are the same thing?
> commit my changes BUT at the same time not require any
> connection or URL
> changes?
I personally am using a separate file which references the database for
all the pages, so should the path need changing, I only have to do it
once..
--
Dogers
Message #3 by "McCloy, Russell" <Russell.McCloy@B...> on Thu, 7 Mar 2002 10:55:02 +1100
|
|
Great question Jude,
I use Ultradev and know what you mean.
look forward to finding an answer.
see ya
RuSs
-----Original Message-----
From: jude@j... [mailto:jude@j...]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 March 2002 11:48 PM
To: aspx_beginners
Subject: [aspx_beginners] Test vs. Production Development
Here's another one for which I haven't been able to dig up an answer...
With ASP, I use Macromedia's UltraDev. It allows me to write code locally,
send a *temp* file to the production server to see how the page looks and
if it functions, and then "synchronize" (copy) the development page over
the production page if I want to commit the changes to the production box.
I think I am missing something with the VS .Net IDE. It creates a project
directory and files on the production box. I find myself doing my
development work on the live (production) web pages, as I have no local,
synchronized copy. This is not very desireable, as coding errors can bring
down a web site. Nor would it be too cool to have to change connection
strings and file locations if I develop locally and then try to transfer
everything to a production box.
Am I missing something obvious? Is there a way to set up a local project
that mirrors the files on the production box in such a way that
development won't affect the live production pages until I'm ready to
commit my changes BUT at the same time not require any connection or URL
changes?
Thanks, from the blind!
j
$subst('Email.Unsub').
Message #4 by jude@j... on Thu, 7 Mar 2002 01:40:58
|
|
Though I never used it much, I recall InterDev as having a local and
master copy of sites, too, like UltraDev. Since the VS.Net IDE kinda sorta
swallowed up InterDev, I'm kinda sorta surprised that functionality wasn't
carried over. Or, if it was, why it's so hard to locate--kinda, sorta.
|
|
 |