Wrox is correct in this context. You cant have fall though in a situation
like this though:
{
case <ValueN>:
doSomething();
case <valueO>:
doSomethingElse();
break;
}
The case for valueN needs a break or the compiler will complain.
Paul.
-----Original Message-----
From: Frode [mailto:fstroemm@o...]
Sent: 13 October 2002 16:39
To: aspx_beginners
Subject: [aspx_beginners] Switch statement rules
Beginning asp.net 1.0 with C# explains this on page 228:
switch (Confirmation
{
case "yes":
case "Yes":
case "YES":
Message.Text = "Details will be sent.";
break;
}
My Microsoft C# step by step book (pg 75) says that Fall-Through syntax is
not allowed with C#.
What is correct?
- Frode
---
Beginning ASP.NET Databases using VB.NET
http://www.wrox.com/ACON11.asp?ISBN=1861006195
Beginning ASP.NET Databases using C#
http://www.wrox.com/ACON11.asp?ISBN=1861007418
These books look at how we can create data-centric ASP.NET
applications. Requiring some basic knowledge of ASP.NET,
Access and SQL the authors guide you through the process
of connecting and consuming information in a variety of
ways. They are packed full of excellent illustrative code
examples, demonstrating important fundamental principles.