|
|
 |
| General .NET For general discussion of MICROSOFT .NET topics that don't fall within any of the other .NET forum subcategories or .NET language forums. If your question is specific to a language (C# or Visual Basic) or type of application (Windows Forms or ASP.Net) try an applicable forum category.
** PLEASE BE SPECIFIC WITH YOUR QUESTION **
When posting here, provide details regarding the Microsoft .NET language you are using and/or what type of application (Windows/Web Forms, etc) you are working in, if applicable to the question. This will help others answer the question without having to ask. |
Welcome to the p2p.wrox.com Forums.
You are currently viewing the General .NET section of the Wrox p2p Programmer to Programmer discussion community. This is a community of more than 40,000 computer programmers including Wrox book authors and readers. As a guest, you can read any forum posting. By joining our free Wrox p2p community you can post your own programming questions and respond to other programmers’ questions. Registered users also don't have to see the ads that are displayed to guests. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join today!
Join today and post to win prizes! Post more to increase your chances of being Wrox’s top poster of the month.
|
 |

January 7th, 2008, 11:37 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: , , .
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
.NET and Security
Hi, Our programming sept and IT dept are having a difference of views on .NET and security risk to the network. We have create an application using .NET. WE wanted to put it on a shared drive to push it out instead of having to put it on each local machine, if we put it on each local machine then everytime we have an update or change the program we have to go back through to each machine to update, but wouldnt need to fi on shared drive, IT says that by putting an application created in .net on a shared or remote drive it is creating a hole in the network and causing a security risk. IT said that by using CASPOL to change permissions that is a risk. Does any one know if this is true or how it works. Thank you
|

January 7th, 2008, 11:58 AM
|
 |
Friend of Wrox
Points: 16,368, Level: 55 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Clifton Park, New York, USA.
Posts: 5,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
I'm not familiar with CASPOL. However...
You might be able to solve this problem but employing 1 click web deployment. You can deploy an application installer that is accessed thru a browser for installation. The app can be configured to automatically check for updates. This can happen at a configurable interval (every app startup or based on some time interval). Once installed, the app will check for updates based on the configuration. This way you can deploy to a single location and the apps will update themselves. This should make everyone happy. (Although, are IT people every really happy with us programmer? ;)
-Peter
|

January 7th, 2008, 04:48 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: , , .
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Peter
Thank you for all your help and yes you are correct, when is IT ever happy with programming. It is a thorn in my side especially because my boss has to me I have to get them to play nice. LOL
|

June 29th, 2009, 06:56 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Berkeley, CA, USA.
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Sounds like running .Net assemblies on a network share is a classic problem. But rather than having some sort of security policy via AD, it seems a lot of people resort to using caspol.
Threads like this are typical.
This guy does a nice job in his MS blog to explain caspol usage.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| Security In Asp.net 2.0 |
mallikalapati |
ASP.NET 2.0 Professional |
2 |
February 11th, 2008 10:15 AM |
| security in NET |
angelboy |
Visual Studio 2005 |
1 |
February 25th, 2007 01:37 PM |
| .net security model |
rahul.agarawal |
ASP.NET 1.0 and 1.1 Professional |
1 |
January 11th, 2007 12:36 AM |
| .net security model |
rahul.agarawal |
ASP.NET 1.0 and 1.1 Basics |
1 |
January 10th, 2007 03:51 AM |
| ASP.NET Security |
unclehughie |
Wrox Book Feedback |
0 |
July 16th, 2003 04:45 PM |
|
 |