|
|
 |
| .NET Web Services Discussions about .NET XML Web Service technologies including ASMX files, WSDL and SOAP. |
Welcome to the p2p.wrox.com Forums.
You are currently viewing the .NET Web Services section of the Wrox p2p Programmer to Programmer discussion community. This is a community of more than 40,000 computer programmers including Wrox book authors and readers. As a guest, you can read any forum posting. By joining our free Wrox p2p community you can post your own programming questions and respond to other programmers’ questions. Registered users also don't have to see the ads that are displayed to guests. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join today!
Join today and post to win prizes! Post more to increase your chances of being Wrox’s top poster of the month.
|
 |

March 2nd, 2005, 11:30 AM
|
|
Authorized User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: , , United Kingdom.
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Web Services Versioning
Hi All,
Does anyone have an views on web service versioning? I am trying to decide upon a web service versioning strategy and at the moment have come up with there is basically no such thing as versioning a web service and to make the service backward compatible you basically have to generate a new web service and point your new clients to that one and keep supporting the existing one untill you move all those clients over.
Any ideas??
Rob
|

March 2nd, 2005, 11:37 AM
|
 |
Friend of Wrox
Points: 16,368, Level: 55 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Clifton Park, New York, USA.
Posts: 5,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
That's it from the way I see it. In order to keep your web service backward compatible you just have to make sure that you don't break the interfaces to it (i.e. don't change the web method signatures).
It almost sounds like you are also talking about moving a web service to a different location (different address). Is this correct? In that case then backward compatibility means keeping the old address available as you said.
- Peter
|

March 2nd, 2005, 12:08 PM
|
|
Authorized User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: , , United Kingdom.
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Hi Peter,
Well what i have found is there are two types of changes that can occour, minor and major. Minor changes allow you to carry on and not break the client, so updates to namespace etc are not really required as the client should still work, you could infact for instance if you have a new method you want to add, specify that in a different namespace, but i wont go into that. The major updates however will almost certain to break the client, and this is when a new end point for new clients would be introduced. From what i have read this is probably all that can be done. Not sure if anyone agrees or not, would be good to have some feedback.
Rob
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
 |