Wrox Programmer Forums
|
BOOK: ASP.NET 2.0 Instant Results ISBN: 978-0-471-74951-6
This is the forum to discuss the Wrox book ASP.NET 2.0 Instant Results by Imar Spaanjaars, Paul Wilton, Shawn Livermore; ISBN: 9780471749516
Welcome to the p2p.wrox.com Forums.

You are currently viewing the BOOK: ASP.NET 2.0 Instant Results ISBN: 978-0-471-74951-6 section of the Wrox Programmer to Programmer discussions. This is a community of software programmers and website developers including Wrox book authors and readers. New member registration was closed in 2019. New posts were shut off and the site was archived into this static format as of October 1, 2020. If you require technical support for a Wrox book please contact http://hub.wiley.com
 
Old October 20th, 2007, 11:26 AM
Authorized User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default sprocApplicationInsertUpdateSingleItem

i don't understand this part of the stored procedure
ELSE
BEGIN
    IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM Application WHERE Description = @description AND Id <> @id)
    BEGIN
        UPDATE Application SET
        Description = @description,
        IsActive = @isActive
        WHERE Id = @id

        SELECT @returnValue = @id
    END
    ELSE
    BEGIN
        SELECT @returnValue = -1 -- item already exists
    END
END

are we making sure that there are no dup record by using the AND Id <> @id? what if we have dups?

 
Old October 20th, 2007, 12:10 PM
Imar's Avatar
Wrox Author
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 17,089
Thanks: 80
Thanked 1,576 Times in 1,552 Posts
Default

Hi there,

Yes correct. This code checks that the new Description of the item being updated does not conflict with an existing one. Since updating itself is fine, should should check for Id <> @id to filter all records other than the current one being updated.

Imar


---------------------------------------
Imar Spaanjaars
http://Imar.Spaanjaars.Com
Everyone is unique, except for me.
Author of ASP.NET 2.0 Instant Results and Beginning Dreamweaver MX / MX 2004
 
Old October 20th, 2007, 06:03 PM
Authorized User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Ok thanks I got it
 
Old October 21st, 2007, 02:43 AM
Imar's Avatar
Wrox Author
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 17,089
Thanks: 80
Thanked 1,576 Times in 1,552 Posts
Default

Hi there,

I am not sure what you are asking. Why would there be a duplicate record? The whole idea in the procedure, for Insert and Updates is to prevent them in the first place.....

Can you elaborate a little bit??

Imar


---------------------------------------
Imar Spaanjaars
http://Imar.Spaanjaars.Com
Everyone is unique, except for me.
Author of ASP.NET 2.0 Instant Results and Beginning Dreamweaver MX / MX 2004
 
Old October 21st, 2007, 04:43 AM
Authorized User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Sorry Imar I was confused about the way you wrote the stored procedure but now I'm not. But I still want know one thing, why you used the sp's return value to return the id? why not using an output parameter?
 
Old October 21st, 2007, 05:47 AM
Imar's Avatar
Wrox Author
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 17,089
Thanks: 80
Thanked 1,576 Times in 1,552 Posts
Default

Return values are a little easier to work with; However, an output parameter is a good choice too.

Imar

---------------------------------------
Imar Spaanjaars
http://Imar.Spaanjaars.Com
Everyone is unique, except for me.
Author of ASP.NET 2.0 Instant Results and Beginning Dreamweaver MX / MX 2004
 
Old October 21st, 2007, 07:51 AM
Authorized User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

ok thanks










Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.