On p.66 there is the following expression:
var1 = var2 <= 4 && var2 >= 2;

in the book it states "where the && operator is processed after the <= and >= operators"

isn't that just the case with the <= due to the conditional evaluation of operands with && ?

If the statement was correct, wouldn't the expression on p.60:
var1 = (var2 != 0) && (var3 / var2 > 2);
throw an exception if var2 is zero.

No, var2 would not throw the exception, but var3 definitely would, when var3 = 0.

Hope this helps.

========================
Disclaimer: The above comments are solely the opinion of one person and not to be construed as a directive or an incentive to commit fraudulent acts.

Why? there is nothing wrong with 0 divided by another number, but you can't divide with 0