Entirely redundant function?

		Wrox Programmer Forums > ASP.NET and ASP > ASP.NET 3.5 > BOOK: Professional ASP.NET 3.5 : in C# and VB ISBN: 978-0-470-18757-9
Entirely redundant function?

BOOK: Professional ASP.NET 3.5 : in C# and VB ISBN: 978-0-470-18757-9

This is the forum to discuss the Wrox book Professional ASP.NET 3.5: In C# and VB by Bill Evjen, Scott Hanselman, Devin Rader; ISBN: 9780470187579

Read more about Professional ASP.NET 3.5: In C# and VB or buy the book from your favorite retailer
Download the code for Professional ASP.NET 3.5: In C# and VB

Welcome to the p2p.wrox.com Forums.

You are currently viewing the BOOK: Professional ASP.NET 3.5 : in C# and VB ISBN: 978-0-470-18757-9 section of the Wrox Programmer to Programmer discussions. This is a community of software programmers and website developers including Wrox book authors and readers. New member registration was closed in 2019. New posts were shut off and the site was archived into this static format as of October 1, 2020. If you require technical support for a Wrox book please contact http://hub.wiley.com

May 30th, 2008, 05:16 AM

RoryBecker RoryBecker is offline

Registered User

Join Date: May 2008

Posts: 1

Thanks: 0

Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Entirely redundant function?

I need a little confirmation....
...In Chapter 2 (Page 92 for best reference)

Isn't the function "GetNumber" entirely pointless?

Seems you could remove this completely and have the button's Onclick call UseCallBack directly.

--
Rory

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
redundant SQL logic	fkish	SQL Language	3	November 12th, 2007 01:28 PM
Removing Redundant Elements from a returned field	scottd	SQL Server 2000	1	January 3rd, 2007 04:33 PM
how to compare if two rectangle redundant	davidwong	C++ Programming	11	August 23rd, 2004 11:41 AM
Eliminating Redundant Records	spraveens	MySQL	1	May 12th, 2004 04:21 AM