Wrox Programmer Forums
|
BOOK: Professional JavaScript for Web Developers ISBN: 978-0-7645-7908-0
This is the forum to discuss the Wrox book Professional JavaScript for Web Developers by Nicholas C. Zakas; ISBN: 9780764579080
Welcome to the p2p.wrox.com Forums.

You are currently viewing the BOOK: Professional JavaScript for Web Developers ISBN: 978-0-7645-7908-0 section of the Wrox Programmer to Programmer discussions. This is a community of software programmers and website developers including Wrox book authors and readers. New member registration was closed in 2019. New posts were shut off and the site was archived into this static format as of October 1, 2020. If you require technical support for a Wrox book please contact http://hub.wiley.com
 
Old April 2nd, 2007, 03:09 PM
Registered User
  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default StringBuffer ie vs. firefox
I tried the StringBuffer concatenation test on p. 98 in both IE and firefox.
It is definitely quicker to use the StringBuffer for concatenation in IE, but in firefox it is the opposite.
Why is this?





Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
String and StringBuffer ps0208 Servlets 3 January 8th, 2008 03:54 AM
Firefox 1.5 enjoysolutions BOOK: Professional Ajax ISBN: 978-0-471-77778-6 1 March 13th, 2006 10:34 AM
StringBuffer - Appending a Substring Clarification nanap BOOK: Beginning Java 2, JDK 5 Edition 0 March 8th, 2006 08:28 AM
StringBuffer - Appending a Substring Clarification nanap BOOK: Beginning Java 2 0 March 8th, 2006 08:25 AM
firefox / IE flipo Beginning PHP 7 November 8th, 2005 12:38 PM




Contact Us - Wrox - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.