Wrox Programmer Forums
Classic ASP Components Discussions specific to components in ASP 3.
Welcome to the p2p.wrox.com Forums.

You are currently viewing the Classic ASP Components section of the Wrox Programmer to Programmer discussions. This is a community of software programmers and website developers including Wrox book authors and readers. New member registration was closed in 2019. New posts were shut off and the site was archived into this static format as of October 1, 2020. If you require technical support for a Wrox book please contact http://hub.wiley.com
Old October 6th, 2004, 05:06 AM
Authorized User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Using ascx file or include

I just want to know it is better to use include for including more than one page or ascx extension for the asp.net pages. asax is for what purpose?


Old October 6th, 2004, 07:32 AM
Friend of Wrox
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

For ASP.NET pages, you don't use include files. For a site template, you use page classing:


For anything else, the ASP.NET framework is object oriented, so you can reference external classes to do the work, or use web user controls. asax is for the global file.


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.ascx file comment tag?? hoouliganian BOOK: ASP.NET 2.0 Website Programming Problem Design Solution ISBN: 978-0-7645-8464-0 0 December 11th, 2006 04:23 AM
difference between include file & include virtual crmpicco Classic ASP Basics 2 January 23rd, 2006 11:50 AM
CodeBehind for .ascx file isn't working lcsgeek General .NET 1 January 21st, 2005 03:50 PM
Include vs. User control(ascx) ajindal General .NET 4 January 8th, 2005 09:40 AM

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.