 |
| HTML Code Clinic Do you have some HTML code you'd like to share and get suggestions from others for tweaking or improving it? This discussion is the place. |
Welcome to the p2p.wrox.com Forums.
You are currently viewing the HTML Code Clinic section of the Wrox Programmer to Programmer discussions. This is a community of software programmers and website developers including Wrox book authors and readers. New member registration was closed in 2019. New posts were shut off and the site was archived into this static format as of October 1, 2020. If you require technical support for a Wrox book please contact http://hub.wiley.com
|
|
|
|
June 30th, 2004, 05:56 AM
|
|
Friend of Wrox
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
And FWIW, IIRC, the statement:
"Dreamweaver *can* create nice looking indented code"
...is highly dependant on which *version* of Dreameweaver is being used. The
statement:
"Dreamweaver MX *can* create nice looking indented code"
I have no argument with. Hell, I've heard that even recent
versions of Frontpage aren't quite as groady as they used
to be*.
Take it easy,
Dan
*IMHO, the entire development team should still be taken out and shot,
for past crimes ("but they're old men!", hear you say "They were only
following orders!" - ah, sod it, I say, shoot'em, anyway. Bill has plenty
more where that lot came from, and he doesn't have to pay their pensions or
healthcare, anymore, either - so it won't matter if one or two survie the
gunshot wounds. The whole argument for Microsoft technologies appears to be
based in how expendable your employees are :).
|
|
June 30th, 2004, 06:02 AM
|
 |
Wrox Author
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 17,089
Thanks: 80
Thanked 1,576 Times in 1,552 Posts
|
|
Yes, I completely agree with that. I should have said Dreamweaver MX and/or Dreamweaver MX 2004.
I have switched to these versions so thoroughly that I have deleted the previous versions from my memory entirely..... ;)
Imar
---------------------------------------
Imar Spaanjaars
Everyone is unique, except for me.
|
|
June 30th, 2004, 02:55 PM
|
 |
Wrox Author
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
For all you newbs that can't figure out the jargon:
http://people.kldp.org/~eunjea/jargon/
: )
Regards,
Rich
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
The Spicy Peanut Project
http://www.spicypeanut.net
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
June 30th, 2004, 03:12 PM
|
|
Friend of Wrox
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Alright, then.... what does the MX in Dreamweaver MX stand for, then? :)
Dan
|
|
June 30th, 2004, 04:05 PM
|
|
Friend of Wrox
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Actually, my understanding was that any two letter combination -
in which one of the letters was an 'X' - when applied to the end
of a product's name, was a means of signifying that the marketing
department had been crawling all over it, and that there wouldn't
be any discounts for existing owners of previous versions. :)
Certainly, Steve Jobs is doing a good job of convincing us that
the 'X' in OS X is short for TANSTAAFL!
Dan
|
|
June 30th, 2004, 04:09 PM
|
|
Friend of Wrox
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,285
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Quote:
quote:Originally posted by Daniel Walker
Actually, my understanding was that any two letter combination -
in which one of the letters was an 'X' - when applied to the end
of a product's name, was a means of signifying that the marketing
department had been crawling all over it, and that there wouldn't
be any discounts for existing owners of previous versions. :)
Certainly, Steve Jobs is doing a good job of convincing us that
the 'X' in OS X is short for TANSTAAFL!
Dan
|
LOL.
Snib
<><
|
|
|
