Why Java isn't completely object oriented language

prasanthrc · September 23rd, 2004, 04:45 AM

Hi EveryBody,

I heard that java is not completely object oriented language.

Can any one give me clarification on this.

Adv. Thanks & Regards
Prasanth.C

prasanth.c

joefawcett · September 23rd, 2004, 05:51 AM

Â¿La mayorÃa de las idiomas no son objeto orientado, tan cuÃ¡l?

Â¿Usted realmente desea escribir:

Code:

Integer i1 = traigaValor();
Integer i2 = traigaOtroValor();
Integer i3 = i1.add(i2);

mÃ¡s bien que

Code:

Integer i3 = traigaValor() + traigaOtroValor();

por ejemplo?

--

Joe

sonicDace · October 8th, 2004, 09:25 AM

Prasm:

Aqui tienes un enlace en ingles con una explicacion sobre los conceptos OOD donde, casualmente, los ejemplos son dados con Java:

Here is a link with an explanation of OOD concepts, where the examples just happen to be in Java

http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/java/concepts/

If what you want is a quick answer as to whether Java is an Object Oriented language, the answer is yes. If you want to know why, I encourage reading these concepts.

thanks

rockyrak · February 4th, 2005, 07:12 PM

Hi,

Java is the only language which supports 99% OOP concepts. The remaining one is just becoz, it also has non object-oriented things like primitive types which they cannot eliminate. But still we have wrapper classes for the respective primitive types.

Java is a pure OOP supporting language.

Ram