Wrox Programmer Forums
Go Back   Wrox Programmer Forums > Database > SQL Language
|
SQL Language SQL Language discussions not specific to a particular RDBMS program or vendor.
Welcome to the p2p.wrox.com Forums.

You are currently viewing the SQL Language section of the Wrox Programmer to Programmer discussions. This is a community of software programmers and website developers including Wrox book authors and readers. New member registration was closed in 2019. New posts were shut off and the site was archived into this static format as of October 1, 2020. If you require technical support for a Wrox book please contact http://hub.wiley.com
 
Old May 8th, 2008, 08:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Varbinary(max) performance issue

I have quick question for you all. Can doing varbinary(max) rather than varbinary(100) make a read/write with less performance?

Can we store 16 bytes values in varbinar(100) or would it overflow?

Thanks in advance






Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
performance issue with the xsl given here anboss XSLT 11 July 16th, 2008 03:05 AM
performance issue keyvanjan Classic ASP Basics 0 May 23rd, 2006 10:57 AM
Performance Issue of Execution bjohnjebastin ASP.NET 1.0 and 1.1 Basics 1 November 14th, 2005 11:18 AM
issue of performance alyeng2000 SQL Server 2000 6 August 20th, 2004 01:17 PM
Performance issue deyakhatib SQL Server 2000 2 June 21st, 2004 10:47 PM





Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.