Wrox Programmer Forums
Go Back   Wrox Programmer Forums > Visual Basic > VB.NET 1.0 > VB.NET 2002/2003 Basics
|
VB.NET 2002/2003 Basics For coders who are new to Visual Basic, working in .NET versions 2002 or 2003 (1.0 and 1.1).
Welcome to the p2p.wrox.com Forums.

You are currently viewing the VB.NET 2002/2003 Basics section of the Wrox Programmer to Programmer discussions. This is a community of software programmers and website developers including Wrox book authors and readers. New member registration was closed in 2019. New posts were shut off and the site was archived into this static format as of October 1, 2020. If you require technical support for a Wrox book please contact http://hub.wiley.com
 
Old March 8th, 2004, 03:47 PM
Authorized User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Pricing: VBA versus Visual Basic.net

Hi,

I have an application written in Excel VBA that performs a specific banking function. The manual performance of this function takes between two and four hours a day. If I market this product can I charge the same price as an application written in Visual Basic.net?
I know that this is a strange question but I greatly appreciate feedback!

 
Old March 8th, 2004, 04:45 PM
Friend of Wrox
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,101
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

you might- but it's easy to "copy" an xls from one machine to another without so much as a registry "hack". I wouldn't expect to sell many. Price depends on how much time you save and how hard it would be for someone else to do the same thing without your VBA.

Hal Levy
Web Developer, PDI Inc.

NOT a Wiley/Wrox Employee
 
Old March 10th, 2004, 05:26 PM
planoie's Avatar
Friend of Wrox
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,407
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Default

I would be most curious to see what kind of performance difference there is between the VBA version and a version written in .NET. Is the 2-4 hours usage time or actual time it takes for the thing to run/process? It sounds pretty complex. I would certainly pay more for something that performs better. Plus, IMO, selling something written in VBA is kind of cheesy. Plus, that creates the requirement that the consumer must have something that runs VBA. Most likely they will, but the .NET framework is free to download and install and you can easily distribute it with the application.

Peter
------------------------------------------------------
Work smarter, not harder.
 
Old March 11th, 2004, 05:43 AM
Friend of Wrox
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I would imagine that if 2-4 hours is the processing time, it would probably run a lot faster as a compiled .exe - I remember when VB.Net was first out, I heard numbers being touted that it ran up to 32 times faster than VB6 - though I've never tested this and would imagine it is very dependent on what you are doing.

 
Old March 11th, 2004, 04:24 PM
Authorized User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the posts guys.
The 2-4 hour time refers to the manual processing time it takes a bank employee to do the job by hand, which is currently the case.
The program (over 4,000 lines of code) does it in a second.
VB.net would appear to be the best way to go it seems but I have yet to tackle it.






Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Visual Basic .NET and processes trailro VB How-To 0 October 21st, 2008 12:30 PM
visual basic.net pringlesoft VB.NET 2 February 11th, 2008 01:46 PM
Rowfilter in Visual Basic.Net ahooi Pro VB.NET 2002/2003 0 July 5th, 2005 03:58 AM
Rowfilter in Visual Basic.Net ahooi ASP.NET 1.0 and 1.1 Basics 0 July 5th, 2005 03:51 AM
Visual basic.net problem Brettvan1 VB.NET 2002/2003 Basics 14 January 24th, 2005 01:40 PM





Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright (c) 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.