Hi,
Please find the below xml file. The footnote inside emph element not show in html . we convert xml to html using xsl, the emph conversion written in xsl, but emph missing for footnote.
XML File
<decision.unit module.type="20" bna.case.id="91" decision.date="02" decision.type="federal" tribunal="ACC">
<agency.case agency.acronym="ACC" bna.case.id="81" document.num="DA 10-2040" agency.doc.id="ACC\DA-10">
<short.name>Total Call Mobile, Inc.</short.name>
<agency.case.annotation>
<decision.num>DA 10-2040</decision.num>
<agency.tribunal acronym="ACC">ACCORDING Communications Commission</agency.tribunal>
<head>Total Call Mobile, Inc.</head>
<decision.date day="02" month="11" year="2010">November 2, 2010</decision.date>
</agency.case.annotation>
<agency.opinion>
<head>ORDER</head>
<head>Adopted: Decmber 25, 2010</head>
<p>By the Chief</p>
<head>I INTRODUCTION</head>
<p>1. In this <emph>Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture</emph>(“<emph>NAL</emph>”), we find that Total Call Mobile, Inc. (“TCM”), a reseller of mobile wireless services,<footnote><footnote.marker><superior>1</superior></footnote.marker><footnote.text><p>Total Call Mobile, Section 214 authorizations.</p></footnote.text></footnote> apparently <footnote><footnote.marker><superior>2</superior></footnote.marker><footnote.text><p>47 C.F.R. § 20.19(i)(1).</p></footnote.text></footnote> and apparently. <footnote><footnote.marker><superior>3</superior></footnote.marker><footnote.text><p><emph>47 C.F.R. § 20.19(h).</emph></p></footnote.text></footnote> For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct TCM to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days of the release of this NAL.</p>
<head>II BACKGROUND</head>
<p>2. In the 2003 </p>
</agency.opinion>
</agency.case>
</decision.unit>
XSL Coding
<xsl:template match="//agency.opinion/head">
<h2 align="centre"><xsl:value-of select="."/></h2>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="*/emph">
<span style="color:blue;"><i><xsl:value-of select="."/></i></span>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="*/emph[@face]">
<b color="green"><xsl:value-of select="."/></b>
</xsl:template>
<!-- footnote[1]/footnote.marker[1]/superior[1] -->
<xsl:template match="//footnote/footnote.marker/superior">
<sup><xsl:value-of select="."/></sup>
</xsl:template>
<!-- footnote.text[1]/p[1] -->
<xsl:template match="footnote.text/p">
<span style="color:red;"><xsl:value-of select="."/></span>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="agency.opinion/p">
<p style="text-indent: 30pt;"><xsl:apply-templates/></p>
</xsl:template>
<!--/decision.unit/agency.case[1]/agency.case.annotation[1]/agency.tribunal[1]-->
<xsl:template match="//agency.case.annotation/agency.tribunal">
<p><xsl:apply-templates/></p>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="//p/text/footnote">
<span style="color:#FF000B"> <xsl:value-of select="."/></span>
</xsl:template>
HTML Output
<html xmlns:std="http://xml.com/xslt-extensions" xmlns:axsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/TransformAlias" xmlns:saxon="http://saxon.sf.net/" xmlns:lnvxe="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/lnvxe" xmlns:lnv="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/lnv" xmlns:lnvni="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/lnvni" xmlns:lnclx="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/lnclx" xmlns:lncle="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/lncle" xmlns:lndel="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/lndel" xmlns:lngntxt="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/lngntxt" xmlns:lndocmeta="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/lndocmeta" xmlns:lnlit="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/lnlit" xmlns:lnci="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/lnci" xmlns:nitf="urn:nitf:iptc.org.20010418.NITF" xmlns:lnvx="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/lnvx" xmlns:ci="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/ci" xmlns:glp="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/glp" xmlns:case="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/glp/case" xmlns:jrnl="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/glp/jrnl" xmlns:comm="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/glp/comm" xmlns:cttr="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/glp/cttr" xmlns:dict="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/glp/dict" xmlns:dig="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/glp/dig" xmlns:docinfo="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/glp/docinfo" xmlns:frm="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/glp/frm" xmlns:in="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/glp/in" xmlns:leg="http://www.lexis-nexis.com/glp/leg" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3c.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ASCII">
<title>Agency Case:</title><style>
BODY, P { font-family: Georgia ; font-size: 10pt }
H2,H3,H4,H5 { color: Darkgreen; font-weight: bold; }
H2 { font-size: 13pt; }
H3 { font-size: 12pt; }
H4 { font-size: 10pt; color: black; }
PRE { BACKGROUND-COLOR: #FBEDBB; FONT-FAMILY: "Courier New", Courier, mono; WHITE-SPACE: pre; }
CODE { COLOR: #990000; FONT-FAMILY: "Courier New", Courier, mono; }
sc {font-variant: small-caps;}
fc { text-transform: uppercase }
</style></head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p></p>
<h2 align="center">Agency Case:</h2>
<table border="all" border-color="#000000" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%">
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Decision.Date:<br>02
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">bna.case.id:<br>November 2, 2010
</td>
<td align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr bgcolor="#9acd32">
<th colspan="4">FCC Doc-NUM</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Doc.NUM:<br>DA 10-2040
</td>
<td align="center">Doc-Num:<br>ACC\DA-10
</td>
<td align="center">Docket-Num:<br></td>
</tr>
</table><script type="text/javascript" src="wz_tooltip.
js"></script>
<p><i>Total Call Mobile, Inc.</i></p>
DA 10-2040
<p>ACCORDING Communications Commission</p>
<p><b>Total Call Mobile, Inc.</b></p>
November 2, 2010
<h2 align="centre">ORDER</h2>
<h2 align="centre">Adopted: Decmber 25, 2010</h2>
<p style="text-indent: 30pt;">By the Chief</p>
<h2 align="centre">I INTRODUCTION</h2>
<p style="text-indent: 30pt;">1. In this <span style="color:blue;"><i>Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture</i></span>(â<span style="color:blue;"><i>NAL</i></span>â), we find that Total Call Mobile, Inc. (âTCMâ), a reseller of mobile wireless services,<sup>1</sup><span style="color:green;">Total Call Mobile, Section 214 authorizations.</span> apparently <sup>2</sup><span style="color:green;">47 C.F.R. § 20.19(i)(1).</span> and apparently. <sup>3</sup><span style="color:red;">47 C.F.R. § 20.19(h).</span> For these apparent violations, we propose a forfeiture in the amount of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000). We also direct
TCM to file the required wireless handset hearing aid compatibility status report within thirty (30) days of the release of
this NAL.
</p>
<h2 align="centre">II BACKGROUND</h2>
<p style="text-indent: 30pt;">2. In the 2003 </p>
</body>
</html>
The emph is missing in footnote no 3.
Kindly solution for this.