Wrox Programmer Forums

Need to download code?

View our list of code downloads.

| FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read
Forum and Wrox.com Feedback Post your suggestions for improving the Forums or Wrox.com or questions for the staff here. "Where can I find the code for my book?"
Welcome to the p2p.wrox.com Forums.

You are currently viewing the Forum and Wrox.com Feedback section of the Wrox Programmer to Programmer discussions. This is a community of tens of thousands of software programmers and website developers including Wrox book authors and readers. As a guest, you can read any forum posting. By joining today you can post your own programming questions, respond to other developers’ questions, and eliminate the ads that are displayed to guests. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free .
DRM-free e-books 300x50
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2004, 05:09 AM
Imar's Avatar
Wrox Author
Points: 72,073, Level: 100
Points: 72,073, Level: 100 Points: 72,073, Level: 100 Points: 72,073, Level: 100
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Utrecht, Netherlands.
Posts: 17,089
Thanks: 80
Thanked 1,587 Times in 1,563 Posts
Default Enhancement Request

Hi everyone,

Would it be possible to somehow mark the e-mail messages that a poster participated in?
I get a lot of messages in my inbox, and it would be really useful to see in which threads I participated, so I can focus on those, and safely ignore the others when I don't have the time to read them.

A marker in the subject or body text would then allow me to set up a filter in my e-mail program.

I realize it may be tricky to do, but IMHO it would be a useful addition.

Cheers,

Imar


---------------------------------------
Imar Spaanjaars
Everyone is unique, except for me.
__________________
Imar Spaanjaars
http://Imar.Spaanjaars.Com
Follow me on Twitter

Author of Beginning ASP.NET 4.5 : in C# and VB, Beginning ASP.NET Web Pages with WebMatrix
and Beginning ASP.NET 4 : in C# and VB.
Did this post help you? Click the button below this post to show your appreciation!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2004, 08:13 AM
planoie's Avatar
Friend of Wrox
Points: 16,481, Level: 55
Points: 16,481, Level: 55 Points: 16,481, Level: 55 Points: 16,481, Level: 55
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Clifton Park, New York, USA.
Posts: 5,407
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Default

I second this request. I have the Snitz forums code and if I get the chance I can probably take a look and figure out what needs to be added and where to put it.

Peter
------------------------------------------------------
Work smarter, not harder.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2004, 12:21 PM
Friend of Wrox
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Posts: 207
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

This is a good idea. So good in fact that I have already implemented it. :D

Now subscription emails will have the message "You have been a participant in this discussion." if you have posted a reply (or started the topic).


planoie -

Thanks for the offer of help with Snitz however the subscriptions processing is one area that we've completely rewritten and doesn't share any original Snitz code. The original Snitz forums process the subscriptions at the time the post is submitted. This proved unacceptable as literally thousands of emails might have to be generated - particularly in the case of forum subscriptions. Instead we've developed a back-end batch process that processes any needed subscription emails every minute or so.

Bruce Luckcuck
Director, Applications & Support Services
Wiley Publishing, Inc.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2004, 12:45 PM
Imar's Avatar
Wrox Author
Points: 72,073, Level: 100
Points: 72,073, Level: 100 Points: 72,073, Level: 100 Points: 72,073, Level: 100
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Utrecht, Netherlands.
Posts: 17,089
Thanks: 80
Thanked 1,587 Times in 1,563 Posts
Default

I should give credit where credit is due: It was Peter who initially brought this up.

I was just switching from message based subscriptions (which is almost impossible when you're subscribed to many messages) to forum based subscriptions when Peter suggested it. I thought it was useful too, so I posted the request.

Thanks for implementing this and thanks even more for doing it so quickly.

Cheers,

Imar


---------------------------------------
Imar Spaanjaars
Everyone is unique, except for me.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2004, 01:38 PM
planoie's Avatar
Friend of Wrox
Points: 16,481, Level: 55
Points: 16,481, Level: 55 Points: 16,481, Level: 55 Points: 16,481, Level: 55
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Clifton Park, New York, USA.
Posts: 5,407
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Bruce,

Thanks a bunch for the quick response. I hate to be a pain, but part of the reason I was going to try my hand was to be able to suggest how it might be done. What you have is great if you have email filters. What I had been thinking was something even simpler (or combined with what you added). I was thinking of having the email subject contain some character like an asterisk so that when messages are sorted, you can very easily see what threads you have been involved in without the need to look thru a message. Something like this:

[*P2P_Feed] Enhancement Request

I often will delete an older thread if it has lots of messages because I figure someone else is helping. But I still have to read thru them to remember if I was involved. If you don't have auto preview or a preview pane, then you still have to open the message(s).

Something like the above is also very handy, because in a list of messages that are sorted by subject (and thus by forum,thread) this would put all "involved" threads at the top of the list.

Obviously, what you added has minimal impact on the users as it's only a slight addition to the email contents. But just thought I would suggest it.

Thanks,
Peter
  #6 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2004, 02:37 PM
Friend of Wrox
Points: 3,489, Level: 24
Points: 3,489, Level: 24 Points: 3,489, Level: 24 Points: 3,489, Level: 24
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Central, NJ, USA.
Posts: 1,102
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Whatever is done- do not change the information between the brackets- people already sort on that.

Hal Levy
Web Developer, PDI Inc.

NOT a Wiley/Wrox Employee
  #7 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2004, 03:11 PM
Friend of Wrox
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Posts: 207
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

It's not a problem to make other changes to the content or the subject line.

I would suggest that we discuss it further to see which solution works best for everyone. As Hal mentioned, I don't think we want to change the part inside of the brackets. Many people have email rules that key off of this info.

Also, remember that the part after the brackets is the subject of the topic. There's nothing to stop someone from putting a "*" in the subject when they create a topic. This could confuse your email rules or sorting.

Bruce Luckcuck
Director, Applications & Support Services
Wiley Publishing, Inc.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old March 15th, 2004, 03:17 PM
Imar's Avatar
Wrox Author
Points: 72,073, Level: 100
Points: 72,073, Level: 100 Points: 72,073, Level: 100 Points: 72,073, Level: 100
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Utrecht, Netherlands.
Posts: 17,089
Thanks: 80
Thanked 1,587 Times in 1,563 Posts
Default

Well, you could add the * in front of the entire topic, e.g.:

*[P2P_Feed] Enhancement Request

That way, Peter's suggestion would still work, while it wouldn't mess with any other mail filtering rules. That is, if people set up filters using Contains, rather than Starts With....
An additional * in the message subject wouldn't cause a problem either, as that would appear after the closing ].

An X header is probably not going to work either, as many Web based mail programs don't support filtering on headers.

If I had to vote for anything, I'd vote for *[P2P_Feed] Enhancement Request

Imar


---------------------------------------
Imar Spaanjaars
Everyone is unique, except for me.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old March 16th, 2004, 01:43 PM
planoie's Avatar
Friend of Wrox
Points: 16,481, Level: 55
Points: 16,481, Level: 55 Points: 16,481, Level: 55 Points: 16,481, Level: 55
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Clifton Park, New York, USA.
Posts: 5,407
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Default

My vote goes to this as well:

*[P2P_Feed] Enhancement Request

(Just discovered that it seems mail filters/rules don't work on IMAP accounts in outlook because there's no "when a message arrives" event in an IMAP account.)

Peter
------------------------------------------------------
Work smarter, not harder.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
request forwarging & request redirection hafizmuhammadmushtaq Servlets 2 April 24th, 2008 12:42 AM
sorting tables enhancement edwards_ BOOK: Professional JavaScript for Web Developers ISBN: 978-0-7645-7908-0 8 August 9th, 2006 03:08 PM
Opinion Polls enhancement void BOOK: ASP.NET 2.0 Website Programming Problem Design Solution ISBN: 978-0-7645-8464-0 2 July 12th, 2006 10:42 PM
Enhancement Request Ben Horne Forum and Wrox.com Feedback 4 March 30th, 2004 08:13 PM
Forum Enhancement Request Ben Horne Forum and Wrox.com Feedback 5 March 22nd, 2004 01:07 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.